ppt课件-compatibilityofsurfaceandaircraftstationnetworksfor.pptVIP

ppt课件-compatibilityofsurfaceandaircraftstationnetworksfor.ppt

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
ppt课件-compatibilityofsurfaceandaircraftstationnetworksfor

Compatibility of surface and aircraft station networks for inferring carbon fluxes TransCom Meeting, 2005 Nir Krakauer California Institute of Technology niryk@caltech.edu Zhonghua Yang, Jim Randerson, Paul Wennberg Motivation Diagnosing model vertical transport with measurements from aircraft: a schematic Inversion set-up GLOBALVIEW-2004 stations Use mean CO2 concentrations for 2000-2003, when more aircraft data collected Only stations with 60% actual data for period Transport operators from TransCom model annual-mean output Data uncertainty assumed proportional to station residual standard deviation TransCom regions and priors Long-term aircraft profiles 2000-3 flux for all northern regions Models that are too vertically stratified tend to imply a larger northern sink Interim conclusions Comparing surface with aircraft data sets suggests that much of the TransCom intermodel variability in northern sink estimates is due to variation in model vertical mixing strength Most TransCom models may have too little vertical mixing, so that surface observations imply an overly large northern sink Detailed comparison of modeled vs. observed vertical CO2 distributions is probably required to diagnose just where this mixing bias arises (convection? isentropic transport? diurnal cycle?) and how to reduce it Next: for an imperfect model, how do we best combine surface with other (e.g. aircraft) observations? Strategies for choosing weights 1) Generalized cross validation Through minimizing a GCV objective function, parameters such as the weighting of prior information (λ) and the differential weighting of high- and low-variability stations (τ) can be set to optimize the model’s prediction of left-out observations See my GRL paper 2) Here we try a maximum-likelihood Bayesian approach (Koch and Kusche 2002) Divide inversion data into independent groups (e.g. surface vs. aircraft observations vs. prior flux information) Scale the initial error covariance matrix of each group

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

heti94575 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档