- 1、本文档共8页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
临床护理路径在骨科护理中的应用效果研究.doc
临床护理路径在骨科护理中的应用效果研究
【摘要】 目的:研究临床护理路径在骨科护理中的应用效果。方法:选取2010年6月-2012年8月本院骨科收治的患者160例,随机数字表法分为观察组及对照组,均行常规骨科护理,而观察组再实施临床护理路径,并观察两组护理效果。结果:观察组住院时间、住院费用、疾病知识掌握率、并发症发生率分别为(16.5±3.2)d、(10 453.4±143.2)元、91.2%、3.8%;对照组分别为(21.2±3.0)d、(14 325.9±141.1)元、76.2%、8.8%。观察组患者疾病知识掌握率高于对照组,住院时间、住院费用及并发症发生率均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。而且观察组满意45例,一般32例,不满意3例,总满意率96.2%;对照组满意31例,一般40例,不满意9例,总满意率88.8%。观察组患者对护理质量总满意率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:临床护理路径在骨科护理中的应用效果满意,建议在临床护理中推广应用。
【关键词】 骨科护理; 临床护理路径; 应用效果
【Abstract】 Objective:To study the application effect of clinical nursing pathway in nursing in department of orthopedics.Method:160 patients from June 2010 to August 2012 were admitted to department of orthopedics in our hospital,they were randomly divided into observation group and control group.The control group were given routine department of orthopedics nursing, the observation group were given clinical nursing pathway on the basis of this, and the nursing effect of the two groups were observed. Result:In the observation group, the hospitalization time, cost of hospitalization, rate of mastering knowledge of disease, complication rates were (16.5±3.2)d,(10 453.4±143.2)yuan,91.2%,3.8%;in the control group, the hospitalization time,cost of hospitalization,rate of mastering knowledge of disease,complication rates were (21.2±3.0) d,(14 325.9±141.1)yuan,76.2%,8.8%.Control rate of disease knowledge in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, the hospitalization time, cost and the incidence of complications were lower than those in the control group in hospital, and the difference was statistically significant(P0.05).In the observation group,45 cases were satisfactory, 32 cases were general, 3 cases were not satisfactory,the total satisfactory rate was 96.2%;in the control group, 31 cases were satisfactory,40 cases were general, 9 cases were not satisfactory,the total effective rate was 88.8%.The nursing quality satisfaction rate in observation group was higher than th
文档评论(0)