老年患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术全麻维持的临床研究.docVIP

老年患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术全麻维持的临床研究.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
老年患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术全麻维持的临床研究.doc

老年患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术全麻维持的临床研究   摘 要 目的:探讨老年患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术全麻维持的临床研究。方法:选取70岁以上行腹腔镜胆囊切除术老年患者80例随机分为A、B两组各40例:A组使用右美托咪定+瑞芬太尼麻醉维持,B组采用丙泊酚+瑞芬太尼麻醉维持。观察记录患者不同时间点的心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)和脑电双频指数值(BIS)值。术后对两组患者进行改良OAA/S评级及Steward苏醒评分并观察记录苏醒时间、不良反应情况。结果:两组患者BIS在不同时间点差异无统计学意义;在各时间点A组患者的HR、MAP明显低于B组,且相邻两个时间点A组患者HR、MAP变化幅度小于B组(P0.05);术后两组患者改良OAA/S评级、Steward苏醒评分及苏醒时间比较差异无统计学意义。结论:老年患者行腹腔胆囊切除术时采用右美托咪定取代丙泊酚作为麻醉镇静剂,对患者术中麻醉维持时血流动力学影响小,安全性好,效果显著。   关键词 老年患者 腹腔镜手术 麻醉 右美托咪定   中图分类号:R657.4; R614.24 文献标识码:B 文章编号:1006-1533(2016)23-0042-03   Clinical study on the maintenance of general anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy*   LI Shiming**, YANG Xiaoying, ZHENG Yanping   (Department of Anesthesia, the People’s Hospital of Boyang County, Shangrao 333100, China)   ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the clinical study on laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: Eighty cases of elderly patients over 70 years old underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly divided into group A (dexmedetomidine + remifentanil) and B (propofol + remifentanil) with 40 cases each. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and bispectral index (BIS) at different time points were investigated. The patients were assessed by the modified OAA/S rating and Steward recovery score and the recovery time and the adverse reaction were observed after the operation. Results: The comparison of BIS at different time points showed no statistical significance. HR and MAP were significantly slower or lower in group A than group B and the changes of HR and MAP at two adjacent time points were less in group A than group B (P0.05). After the operation, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the modified OAA/S rating, Steward recovery rating and recovery time. Conclusion: Replacement of propofol with dexmedetomidine as analgesics for elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy has small hemodynamic effect,

文档评论(0)

yingzhiguo + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:5243141323000000

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档