- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
肾脏替代治疗时间对重症急性肾衰竭患者预后的影响.doc
肾脏替代治疗时间对重症急性肾衰竭患者预后的影响
[摘要] 目的 探讨对重症急性肾衰竭患者采用不同的肾脏替代时间产生的预后效果。 方法 选取2013年2月~2015年2月我院收治的120例重症急性肾衰竭患者作为研究对象,其中60例患者的肾脏替代治疗时间12 h,将其设为长时组,60例患者的肾脏替代治疗时间在6~12 h以内,将其设为短时组。分别观察两组患者的治疗效果以及预后情况。 结果 对两组患者治疗前后的BUN、SCr、APACHEⅡ评分以及HR、MAP、Na+、HCO3-、K+进行比较,仅治疗后长时组的BUN、SCr、Na+、HCO3-指标与短时组相比差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。长时组死亡17例(28.3%)与短时组死亡19例(31.7%)差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.159,P0.05)。 结论 不同的肾脏替代治疗时间对重症急性肾衰竭患者的预后效果无太大影响,但在早期及时进行治疗对患者的预后有一定的影响。
[关键词] 肾脏替代治疗时间;重症急性肾衰竭;血流动力学;预后
[中图分类号] R692.5 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2015)31-0068-03
Effect of renal replacement therapy time on the prognosis of patients with severe acute renal failure
LIU Qiang1 XU Lin2
1.Department of Critical Care Medicine, the Affiliated Dongnan Hospital of Xiamen University, PLA 175 Hospital, Zhangzhou 363000, China; 2.Department of Nephrology, the Affiliated Dongnan Hospital of Xiamen University, PLA 175 Hospital, Zhangzhou 363000, China
[Abstract] Objective To explore the prognosis effect of different renal replacement time on the patients with severe acute renal failure. Methods A total of 120 patients with severe acute renal failure who were admitted to our hospital from February 2013 to February 2015 were selected as the research subjects. Among them, the renal replacement therapy time of 60 patients was longer than 12 h, and they were assigned to the long time group. 60 patients with 6-12 h renal replacement therapy time were assigned to the short time group. Curative effects and prognosis were observed in the two groups of patients. Results BUN, SCr, APACHE Ⅱ score and HR, MAP, Na+, HCO3-, K+ before and after the treatment in the two groups of patients were compared. Only BUN, SCr, Na+, HCO3- in the long time group after the treatment were significantly different compared with those in the short time group, and the differences were statistically significant(P0.05). Death was observed in 17 patients (28.3%) in the long time group, and there was not significantly different compared to 19 dead patients (
文档评论(0)