经皮肝穿刺胆道内射频消融联合胆道支架与单纯胆道支架治疗恶性胆道梗阻的效果对比.docVIP

经皮肝穿刺胆道内射频消融联合胆道支架与单纯胆道支架治疗恶性胆道梗阻的效果对比.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
经皮肝穿刺胆道内射频消融联合胆道支架与单纯胆道支架治疗恶性胆道梗阻的效果对比.doc

经皮肝穿刺胆道内射频消融联合胆道支架与单纯胆道支架治疗恶性胆道梗阻的效果对比   [摘要] 目的 比较经皮肝穿刺胆道内射频消融(RFA)联合胆道自扩式金属支架(SEMS)植入与单纯SEMS植入治疗恶性胆道梗阻的效果及支架通畅率差异。 方法 将2012年6月~2015年3月在海军总医院治疗的25例不可切除的恶性胆道梗阻患者分为两组:10例接受经肝胆道内RFA联合SEMS植入治疗的患者作为治疗组,15例接受单纯SEMS植入治疗的患者作为对照组。比较两组患者治疗前、治疗后1周的总胆红素(TBIL)、直接胆红素(DBIL)、谷氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)及谷氨酰氨基转肽酶(γ-GT)水平;观察治疗后3、6、9、12个月时两组支架通畅率。 结果 两组患者年龄、性别、疾病谱及术前TBIL、DBIL、ALT、γ-GT水平比较,差异均无统计学意义(P 0.05);术后1周两组患者TBIL、DBIL、ALT及γ-GT水平均较术前明显下降,差异均有高度统计学意义(P 0.05);治疗后9、12个月,治疗组支架通畅率高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P 0.05)。 结论 与单纯植入SEMS比较,经皮肝穿刺胆道内RFA联合SEMS植入治疗恶性胆道梗阻,可以提高胆道支架植入术后的中远期通畅率。   [关键词] 射频消融术;支架植入术;恶性胆道梗阻;黄疸;通畅率   [中图分类号] R541.7 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2016)10(a)-0099-05   Comparison of the effect of stent implantation and percutaneous endobiliary radiofrequency ablation combined with stentin in the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction   YANG Chao* LU Wei*   Department of Interventional Medicine, Navy General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China   [Abstract] Objective To compare the efficacy and stent patency rate between self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) implantation after endobiliary Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) and SEMS implantation in the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). Methods Twenty-five patients with unresectable MBO were treated at Navy General Hospital from June 2012 to March 2015, and divided into two groups: 10 patients were treated by SEMS placement after percutaneous endobiliary RFA as treatment group, the other 15 patients received only SEMS implantation as control group. The levels of serum TBIL, DBIL, ALT and γ-GT before and after treatment were compared between the two groups; stent patency rate 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after treatment were observed. Results Age, sex, primary disease and serum TBIL, DBIL, ALT and γ-GT before operation in the two groups had no statistically significant difference (P 0.05); compared with before operation, levels of the serum TBIL, DBIL, ALT and γ-GT were significantly decreased 1 week after operation, the differences were s

文档评论(0)

yingzhiguo + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:5243141323000000

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档