物权法视野下的征收.pdfVIP

第27 卷第7 期 Vol. 27, No. 7 调北法学 2009 年 7 月 Hebei Law Science Jul. , 2 0 0 9 物权法视野下的征收 傅强 （北京大学法学院，北京 1 （削86) 擒 ’I ：我国民酶关于征收的讨论主要是从宪法庭画展开的．并且集中在公共利益、征收程序和公正补偿几个方面。在物 权法视野下，比较物权法征收条款网宪法规定在内容和效力上的兹别，区分其与行政法规定在内涵和植序上的分 野，论证物权~征收条款在法律体系中的独立地位。围绕物极法征收条款网相近制度的区别．比较分街德国、法 国和笑国的征收实践．提出并探讨“对财产权何种穆度的干渺构成征收”这一前键性问题。量量后，针对i丘来争论比 较8世烈的机动车限衍问题，进行理论上的分笑，并澄清其中…些模糊的前提。 关键词：征收；物仪法；宪法z 物权限制；机动车限行 中阳分钱句： DF521 :it副院标识确： A 文，脏”寄： I 002-3933 ( 2阔的07-0122-08 Takings from the Perspective of the Property Law FU Qiang ( Lew School,Peking Univenity, Beijir’g 100086 China) Abstract: Currently, discussions 怜。ut takings mainly proceed from the penpective of constitution, and focus especially on such 酬’ peets 制 public interest, condemnation procedure and fair compensation. However, from the pe阳pective of the property Jaw, this article compares the difference 嗣to the content and effectiveness between takings clause of the property law and its counterpart of constitution, distinguishes the connotation and 抑制“ure u肺d by the prope的y law and the constitution, and prov回 the independence of the takings cl翩翩。｛ property law in the legal system. Centering on the difference betw制n takings clause of the property law and eimilar institution,, this pape曾 provides a comparative analysis of taking practice in Gennany, France and the Unit创 States , and prop怖”由e prer吨uisite prob）棚“the interference to what extent consti- tut嗣 a ta