Benefits Management Process Complements Other Project Management Methodologies英文文献资料.docVIP

J. Software Engineering Applications, 2010, 3, 839-844 839 doi:10.4236/jsea.2010.39097 Published Online September 2010 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/jsea) Benefits Management Process Complements Other Project Management Methodologies Ioannis Karamitsos , Charalampos Apostolopoulos , Moteb Al Bugami 1 2 3 1 Telecom Lab, On Telecoms, Athens, Greece; Strategic Business Development Division, IB PRAXIS, London, UK; Department of 2 3 Management Information Systems, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Email: ch_apostolopoulos@yahoo.co.uk ABSTRACT The benefits management approach complements most of the common project management methodologies such as crit- ical chain project management (CCPM), and PRINCE2. The majority of these methodologies focus on how to comply with three parameters: time, cost and quality instead of identifying the positive outcomes and benefits for an organiza- tion. In this paper, a different approach for the organization is presented, which focuses on positive outcomes named as benefits. Moreover, a comparison between Benefits Management and PRINCE2 methodologies is illustrated. Keywords: Benefits Management, PRINCE2, Requirements Analysis 1. Introduction ders and IS/IT specialists is achieved within meet- ings or face-to-face discussions rather than effec- tive workshops which clearly state the aims, objec- tives goals and overall strategic activities planning. However, Apostolopoulos and Karamitsos [2], ex- plained project failure reasoning in terms of behavioural perspectives. More precisely, the lacking of efficient com- munication may be a result of different individual and environmental approache