Rethinking Feyerabend The “Worst Enemy of Science” 英文参考文献.docVIP

Rethinking Feyerabend The “Worst Enemy of Science” 英文参考文献.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Rethinking Feyerabend The “Worst Enemy of Science” 英文参考文献

BookReview/ScienceintheMedia RethinkingFeyerabend:The‘‘WorstEnemyofScience’’? IanJamesKidd* DepartmentofPhilosophy,DurhamUniversity,Durham,UnitedKingdom The relationship between science and the philosophy of science is likely to be judged a contested one. Certainly many philosophicaldebatesmayseemobliqueto the uninitiated (and even then, perhaps still!), whilst recent intellectual debacles have tended to portray philosophers of scienceinapoorlight.Duringthe1990s, for example, the ‘‘Science Wars’’ erupted over the question of whether scientific theories provided true, objective descrip- tions of reality, or whether they were simply arbitrary ‘‘constructions,’’ mere mythologies on a par with ancient Greek theogonyormedievalmagic[1].Thereis some truth to such charges, some of it certainly attributable to an unhealthy certain intoxication with trendy theories (like ‘‘relativism’’ and ‘‘constructionism’’). Yet even if those charges are not always justified, and even if the majority of the philosophy of science is informed and responsible, it remains true that philoso- phers of science who pitch into debates about the sciences beyond their own professional boundaries must take extra carebeforelettingloosetheirideas. culturalcritics,butwiththedangerswhich arosewhenpeoplefailtounderstandand appreciatescience.Backinthe1960sand early 1970s, Feyerabend urged philoso- phersofsciencetotakeseriouslyboththe historyofscienceandscientificpractice— he was a trained physicist himself—and warned his peers that mere abstract reflection on the sciences would produce only idealised fantasies of science, rather than workable models of it. Although subsequent generations ofphilosophers of science took him seriously, many at the timetookhisclaimasapersonalattack— hencethe‘‘badreputation.’’ Into the 1980s, Feyerabend began to expand the scope of his ideas. By the beginningofthe1980s,thephilosophyof science was a richer discipline, so Feyer- abend moved onto new issues. It struck himth

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

sheppha + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:5134022301000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档