巧用韦达定理的推论(国外英文资料).docVIP

巧用韦达定理的推论(国外英文资料) And thats what happens with the verda theorem Wada theorem reveals a yuan quadratic equation, the relationship between product and coefficient of the sum of two, in the study, however, we also often encountered, the ratio of the sum of squares of the difference between the two problems, if we can established relations with their coefficient, directly use the relationship to the problem solving, is not true? Here are three corollaries of the verda theorem that will surprise you. ? So the corollary is that x1, x2 is the quadratic equation of the quadratic equation, ax2 plus bx plus c is equal to 0 of a not 0. ? So the corollary is that x1, x2 is the quadratic equation of a quadratic equation, ax2 + bx + c = 0 (ac not 0). ? So the corollary is that x1, x2 is the quadratic equation of a quadratic equation, ax2 plus bx plus c is equal to 0 (a is not equal to 0). ? Using the above reasoning to solve this problem, it is very helpful to improve students ability to solve the problem. ? One, evaluate We know that x1, x2 is equal to 2x2 plus 2x minus 1 is equal to 0, and then |, x1 minus x2, | is equal to ____ Solution: by inference 1: | x1 minus x2 | = Lets say that x1, x2 is the equation x2 plus 6x plus q is equal to 0, and 3x1 plus 2x2 is equal to 0, and then q is equal to ____. ? Solution: 3x1 plus 2x2 is equal to 0. By inference, too: ∴ q = - 216. So we know that the equation for x, x2 minus k plus 1, x plus k plus 2 is equal to the sum of the squares of the two solid roots, which is equal to 6, which is the value of k. ? So lets solve the equation x2 minus k plus 1 times x plus k plus 2 is equal to the two roots of x1, x2, ∴ by question know k2-3 = 6, ∴ k2 = 9, k = 3 mm. Because when k = 3, the original equations have no real root, ∴ k = 3 should be abandoned. So the k value is 3. ? The relationship between the coefficients ? If the equation x2 + px + q = 0 is 2 times that of the other, then p, the relationship that is satisfied by q is ____. ? Solutio