血液透析联合连续静―静脉血液滤过治疗蜂蜇伤合并心衰效果.docVIP

血液透析联合连续静―静脉血液滤过治疗蜂蜇伤合并心衰效果.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
血液透析联合连续静―静脉血液滤过治疗蜂蜇伤合并心衰效果

血液透析联合连续静―静脉血液滤过治疗蜂蜇伤合并心衰效果   [摘要] 目的 ?u价血液透析联合连续静-静脉血液滤过(CVVH)治疗蜂蜇伤合并心衰的临床效果。 方法 回顾性分析重庆市江津区中心医院2014年3月~2016年3月收治的74例蜂蜇伤合并心衰患者的临床资料,按照治疗方法分为观察组(37例)和对照组(37例),两组均在常规治疗的基础上给予血液透析,观察组加用CVVH。比较两组患者治疗前后生化指标变化及透析相关并发症发生情况,分析血液透析联合CVVH的临床疗效与安全性。 结果 观察组住院时间低于对照组,置换/透析液剂量、超滤量大于对照组,治疗费用高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。观察组病死率为2.70%(1/37),小于对照组的13.51%(5/37),差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。 结论 较单纯血液透析而言,血液透析联合CVVH能够在保证治疗安全性的前提下缩短患者恢复时间、提高临床总有效率,对患者生存质量的改善具有积极意义,但是高昂的治疗成本可能造成推广范围受限 [关键词] 血液透析;连续静-静脉血液滤过;蜂蜇伤;心衰 [中图分类号] R646 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2017)02(b)-0113-04 [Abstract] Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of hemodialysis combined with continuous veno venous hemofiltration (CVVH) treating bee sting patients with heart failure. Methods From March 2006 to March 2016, in Center Hospital of Jiangjin District, the clinical data of 74 bee sting patients with heart failure were retrospective analyzed, they were divided into observation (37 cases) group and control group (37 cases), they were treated with hemodialysis on the basis of conventional treatment, the observation group added with CVVH. The changes of biochemical indexes and dialysis related complications before and after treatment in two groups were compared, and the clinical efficacy and safety of hemodialysis combined with CVVH were analyzed. Results The hospitalization time in the observation group was lower than that of the control group, the replacement/dialysis dose, ultrafiltration volume, the cost of treatment in observation group were higher than those in control group, the differences were statistically significant (P 0.05). The mortality rate of the observation group was 2.70% (1/37), which was lower than that of the control group [13.51% (5/37)], the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). Conclusion Compared with hemodialysis, hemodialysis combined with CVVH can shorten the patient recovery time guarantee with safety of the premise, increase the total clinical efficiency, it has a positive significance

文档评论(0)

docman126 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:7042123103000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档