ICP-AES和ICP-MS法测定不同环境样品中重金属镉的比较.pdfVIP

安徽农业科学，Joumal of Anhui Agri. Sci. 2016 ,44(12) :87 -88 , 103 责任编辑陈红红责任校对况玲玲 ICP -AES 和 ICP-MS 法测定不同环境样晶中重金属铺的比较 李敏，胡艳丽，庞春燕，李晓曼，蔡伊步* 〈四川省南充市环境监测中心站，四川南充 637棚) 摘要 [目的]比较 ICP -AES 和 ICP -MS 法测定重金属锡的优缺点，明确这2 种方法各自的适用范围。[方法]对环境样品预处理后， 分别采用 ICP-AES 和 ICP-MS 法测定锡含量，并对2 种方法进行比较。[结果]ICP - AES 和 ICP - MS 法的线性相关系数均为 o. 朔 9 ，精密度均优于3.0% ，回收率为 96.0% -100.6% ，且对标准参考物质的测定结果均符合证书值要求，测定结果之间并无显著性差异。 ICP-MS 检出限更低，但仪器成本高，普及率低，主要应用在痕量及超痕量分析;ICP-AES 在基层实验室的普及率更高。[结论]对于锡 的常规分析优先选用 ICP-AES，对于土滚样品，ICP-MS 具有明显的测定优势。 关键词重金属;锅jICP - AES;ICP - MS;检出限 中图分类号 X830.2 文献标识码 A 文章编号 0517 -6611(2016)12 -087-02 Com萨U恤R between Two Me位lOdS for Cadmium Determina筒。，n in Environmental Samples LI Min,HU Yan- Ii,PANG Chun惆n， CAI Yi咄a et al (Nanchong Environmental Monitoring Center ,Nanchong ,Sichuan 637αXl) Abstrad [ Objective] To com归re the advantages and di姐dvantag四 of ICP - AES and ICP - MS for detecting cadmium in environrnental 姐rn­ ples ,and to find the application range of 出e two methods. [Method 1Mter pretreatment of environmental samples ,cadmium content w嗣 detected by 由e two me由他. [Result] The linear correlation coefficients of ICP - AES and ICP - MS were both 0.999 ，由e RSD were 由an.3.0% ; recov- eηrates were between 96.0% and 103.6%. Detection results of standard reference materia!s met 由ere甲.urements of certificate va!ue. 咀lere were no sigr证Ìcant differences among detection results. ICP - MS had lower detection limit ,but the inslrument w描 expensive with low populari- zing rate. Thus ,it w描 mainly applied in trace and ultra trace analysis. However ,ICP - AES had higher popularizing rate in loca! laboratory. [Conclusion] ICP - AES is preferable for the routine analysis of cadrnium ,while ICP - MS has ohvious advantages for 四边跑mples. Key words Heavy meta!; Cadmium; ICP - AES; ICP - MS; Detection limit 1