- 1、本文档共18页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
From David Bloor, The Strong Programme in the Sociology of Knowledge
Chapter One
Can the sociology of knowledge investigate and explain the very content and nature of scientific
knowledge? Many sociologists believe that it cannot. They say that knowledge as such, as
distinct from the circumstances surrounding its production, is beyond their grasp. They
voluntarily limit the scope of their own enquiries. I shall argue that this is a betrayal of their
disciplinary standpoint. All knowledge, whether it be in the empirical sciences or even in
mathematics, should be treated, through and through, as material for investigation. Such
limitations as do exist for the sociologist consist in handing over material to allied sciences like
psychology or in depending on the researches of specialists in other disciplines. There are no
limitations which lie in the absolute or transcendent character of scientific knowledge itself, or in
the special nature of rationality, validity, truth or objectivity.
It might be expected that the natural tendency of a discipline such as the sociology of knowledge
would be to expand and generalise itself moving from studies of primitive cosmologies to that of
our own culture. This is precisely the step that sociologists have been reluctant to take. Again,
the sociology of knowledge might well have pressed more strongly into the area currently
occupied by philosophers, who have been allowed to take upon themselves the task of defining
the nature of knowledge. In fact sociologists have been only too eager to limit their concern with
science to its institutional framework and external factors relating to its rate of growth or
direction This leaves untouched the nature of the knowledge thus created (cf. Ben-David (1971),
DeGre (1967), Merton (1964) and Stark (1958)).
What is the cause for this hesitation and pessimism? Is it the enormous intellectual and practical
difficulties which would attend such a programme? Certainly these mu
您可能关注的文档
- Fred Nickols - The Knowledge In Knowledge Management英文资料.pdf
- god's.eternal.knowledge.augustine英文资料.pdf
- Good Taste in Knowledge英文资料.docx
- green hotel knowledge and tourists staying behavior英文资料.pdf
- hayek low (The Use of Knowledge in Society)英文资料.pdf
- heuristics A Report on a Course on Knowledge Acquisition_Foerster英文资料.pdf
- Hindsight≠foresight the effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty英文资料.pdf
- Ignorance, Knowledge and Outcomes in a Small World英文资料.pdf
- Information_Ecology_and_Knowledge_Management_Toward_Knowledge_Ecology_for_Hyperturbulent_Or英文资料.pdf
- A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances教材.pdf
最近下载
- 2024新兴际华资本控股限公司招聘3位投资总监高频考题难、易错点模拟试题(共500题)附带答案详解.docx
- 未成年人保护法预防未成年人犯罪法法律知识科普班会ppt课件.pptx VIP
- 成都2023年市场总结及2024年展望.pdf
- 家庭对未成年人犯罪的影响因素分析——基于全国未成年犯调查.pdf
- 个人简历模板表格空白实用可编辑.doc
- 4川教版(2024)三年级上册 在线导航选路线.pptx VIP
- EPC项目管理要点三个模板,可供投标用.doc
- 湘科版六年级科学上册教学计划(含教学进度表).docx
- 管理咨询方法论之黄金圈思考法则--20210705.pptx
- 人工智能基础与应用高职全套教学课件.pptx
文档评论(0)