云南省某高校贫困新生应付方式调查.pdfVIP

296 中国公共卫生2008年3月第24卷第3期 ChinJPublicHealthMar2008 Vo1．24No．3 文章编号：1001．0580(2008}03—0296—02 中图分类号：R 161．5 文献标志码：A 【专题报道之二】 云南省某高校贫困新生应付方式调查 查明华 摘 要：目的 了解高校贫困新生入学时具有的应付方式特点，以便有效地开展心理健康教育。方法 采用问 卷测查231名贫困新生的应付方式。结果 被调查对象更多地倾向于使用解决问题和求助的应付方式，退避、幻想应 付方式的使用也有一定的频度，合理化和自责的应付方式较少使用。应付方式的类型可概括为4种：混合型、积极型、 消极型、一般型。分别占21．6％。35．56％，16．5％，26．4％。不同性别和专业的自责应付方式差异有统计学意义，退避 应付方式存在明显的性别和专业交互作用。结论 高校贫困新生以积极应付方式和类型为主，消极应付方式的使用 较多见于退避和幻想．消极型与混合型应付方式类型的比例合计超过30％。 关键词：应付方式；问卷调查；贫困新生；高校 Survey on coping style of pOOlfreshmen of college in Yunnan province Z／-／A Ming-hua．Department of Social Sciences Re— search，Wenshan Teachers’College(Wenshan 663000，China) Abstract：0bjective Exploring character of coping style that the poor freshmen of college had when they went into the college，SO that the psychology—health education could be carried out effectively．Methods Surveying the coping style of 231 poor freshmen with the questionnaire made by XIAO Ji—hua．Results The SUbjects resorted more to the coping styles of problem solving and help seeking than the avoidance and fantasy coping styles were used in high frequency，while the rational— ization and self—abusiveness coping style were used the fewest．There were four types of cop mg style，multiple(21．6％)，ac— tive(35．56％)，negative(16．5％)，general(26．4％)；In self—abusiveness coping style，there significant difference in seX and major．In avoidance coping style，there Was significant interaction between sex and major．Conclusion The poor freshmen mainly used active coping styles and large numbers of them belonged to active type of coping style．The negative coping styles they used more were the avoidance and fantasy coping，the proportion of negative type of coping style plus multiple one Was over thirty percent．