efficacy and feasibility of the “girls’ recreational activity support program using information technology” a pilot randomised controlled trial有效性和可行性的u201c女孩的休闲活动使用信息技术支持项目u201d试点的随机对照试验.pdfVIP

下载本文档

0
0
约7.38万字
约 7页
2017-08-28 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

efficacy and feasibility of the “girls’ recreational activity support program using information technology” a pilot randomised controlled trial有效性和可行性的u201c女孩的休闲活动使用信息技术支持项目u201d试点的随机对照试验.pdf

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

efficacy and feasibility of the “girls’ recreational activity support program using information technology” a pilot randomised controlled trial有效性和可行性的u201c女孩的休闲活动使用信息技术支持项目u201d试点的随机对照试验

Advances in Physical Education 2012. Vol.2, No.1, 10-16 Published Online February 2012 in SciRes (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/ape) /10.4236/ape.2012.21002 Efficacy and Feasibility of the “Girls’ Recreational Activity Support Program Using Information Technology”: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial Tracey L. Kelty, Philip J. Morgan, David R. Lubans Faculty of Education and Arts, School of Education, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia Email: Tracey.Kelty@.au Received October 27th th th , 2011; revised November 30 , 2011; accepted December 10 , 2011 This study evaluated the effects of the Girls Recreational Activity Support Program Using Information Technology (GRASP-IT) intervention. This group randomized controlled trial for older adolescent girls (15 years+) combined face-to-face sessions with the use of a social network website, Facebook. Baseline and follow-up measurements were taken for physical activity (5 day pedometer), height, weight, esti- mated VO2max (Queen’s College Step Test), self-efficacy and peer social support. A process evaluation was conducted and included questionnaires and focus groups interviews. Although, the intervention group increased physical activity (mean 1878 steps/day) the difference between groups was not significant (p = 0.11, d = 0.8). BMI, fitness, self-efficacy and peer support all improved for the intervention gr