沙枣治疗婴幼儿急性腹泻病临床探究.docVIP

沙枣治疗婴幼儿急性腹泻病临床探究.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
沙枣治疗婴幼儿急性腹泻病临床探究

沙枣治疗婴幼儿急性腹泻病临床探究   作者:多里坤#12539;木扎帕尔,吐尔逊娜依#12539;玉山,古丽娜尔#12539;乌拉孜别克 【关键词】 婴幼儿;腹泻;沙枣   [摘要] 目的:观察比较沙枣与思密达辅助治疗婴幼儿腹泻的疗效。方法:300例急性非重症腹泻病患儿随机分为两组:A组150例用沙枣干粉剂,B组150例用思密达治疗。结果:治疗72 h,A、B两组大便总次数分别减低64.1%和63.3%;每日平均次数较治疗前明显减少(u=9.5,Plt;0.001),A组水样便由治疗前的72.5%减少至27.5%,脱水患者由75.2%减少为24.8%,与B组结果相近(t=0.74,P=0.4),与治疗前比较差异有统计学意义(u=10.2,Plt;0.001);每次平均大便量分别减少65.4%和60.0%,差异有统计学意义(t=2.63,Plt;0.05)。A组和B组每日ORS量分别与治疗初期相比差异有统计学意义(u=10.5,Plt;0.001),两组间比较差异有统计学意义(t=4.5,Plt;0.001)。结论:沙枣能减轻腹泻的程度,缩短病程,在减少大便量和ORS的摄入量方面优于思密达。   [关键词] 婴幼儿;腹泻;沙枣   A clinical study on the treatment of Elaeagnus angustifolia in infants with acute watery diarrhea   [Abstract] Objective:In order to explore a cheaper and effective therapy for the acute infantile watery diarrhea in the underdeveloped rural areas, we compared the therapeutic effect of the Elaeagnus angustifolia (EA) with Smecta on acute infantile watery diarrhea. Methods: The 300 pediatric patients with acute nonsevere watery diarrhea were randomly divided into two groups, patients in group A (150 cases) were treated with EA powder plus ORS, while patients in group B (150 cases) with Smecta plus ORS. Results: After 72 hs’ treatment the total stool frequency reduced by 64.1% and 63.3% in two groups respectively, with the average frequency of stool per day reduced significantly compared with pretreatment which showed a significant statistical difference (u=9.5, Plt;0.001). The percentage of the watery diarrhea was decreased from 72.5% to 27.5% in group A. Besides, the proportion of the cases with mild and moderate dehydration was decreased from 75.2% to 24.8%. The similar results were in group B (χ2=0.7, P=0.4). There wasn’t any statistically significant difference between these two groups. Average volume of diarrhea per time reduced by 65.4% and 60.0% (t=2.63, Plt;0.01) respectively. The dosage of ORS intake for the patients showing a significantly statistical difference (u=10.5, Plt;0.001) than that of the earlier stage of disease, there was significan

文档评论(0)

docman126 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:7042123103000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档