修复性司法与宽严相济刑事司法政策-法律学专业毕业论文.pdfVIP

writer approves to seek experiences through studying and discussing the issue. The main text is divided three major parts: The first part introduces characters of the restorative justice and the traditional criminal judicature, manifesting both of them is interlinked in the value. It is very necessary to combine the two juridical ideas, especially thinking about the Trinity Structure proposed by Dr. Gao Weijian. The second part mainly revolves the criminal countermeasure. Compared with the “Punish and Alleviate Criminal Policy”, our country’s current criminal policy advocates loose penalty. It gradually combines the restorative justice and the traditional criminal judicature, exploring a Chinese characteristic road of juridical reform. The third part introduces the related stipulation in our current law and local practical experiences, indicating the Forgive and Strict Criminal Policy’s positive function in juridical reform through the case China V. Xu Ting, at last proposing some suggestions on procedure and system. KeyWords: Restorative Justice Forgive and Strict Criminal Policy 5 目 录 导 言………………………………………………………………………1 一、修复性司法与传统刑事司法的价值………………………………2 (一)二者价值的特点：功利与报应兼而有之…………………………2 1、修复性司法：功利在外，报应在内……………………………2 2、传统刑事司法：报应在外，功利在内…………………………5 （二）二者理念关系的互补……………………………………………7 1、互补具有理论基础………………………………………………7 2、互补的必要性……………………………………………………8 二、宽严相济刑事政策………………………………………………8 （一）何为“宽严相济”……………………………………………8 1、宽严相济的“宽” ……………………………………………9 2、宽严相济的“严” ……………………………………………9 3、宽严相济的“济” ……………………………………………10 （二）宽严有度的发展方向……………………………………………11 1、与“惩办与宽大相结合”相区别………………………………11 2、宽严有度…………………………………………………………13 （三）糅合传统刑事司法和修复性司法的理念………………………13 1、“宽”体现修复性司法的理念…………………………………