- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
盲插法放置螺旋型鼻肠管行肠内营养对重症监护患者护理效果评价
精品论文 参考文献
盲插法放置螺旋型鼻肠管行肠内营养对重症监护患者护理效果评价
梁翠娥
[摘 要]目的 探讨盲插法放置螺旋型鼻肠管行肠内营养对重症(监护)患者效果,并提出相应护理策略。 方法 120例患者随机1:1分为2组,分别采用传统鼻胃管经胃营养和螺旋型肠鼻管空肠营养,比较两组患者各生化指标变化,并记录并发症发生率。 结果 治疗后,两组患者WBC和APACHE-Ⅱ明显降低,与治疗前相比差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.05),且观察组WBC、APACHE-Ⅱ降低程度高于对照组(Plt;0.05),两组ALB、ALT、ALP和AST与治疗前相比差异均无统计学意义(Pgt;0.05);观察组胃潴留、胃肠出血、返流、误吸和鼻粘膜损伤发生率均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.05),腹胀、腹泻和吸入性肺炎发生率与对照组差异无统计学意义(Pgt;0.05)。 结论 螺旋型鼻肠管行空肠营养能够明显改善患者营养状态,减少并发症发生。但应用时应加强护理。
[关键词]螺旋型鼻肠管 肠内营养 重症患者
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2014.21.33
作者单位:274300,山东菏泽,菏泽市立医院
[作者简介]梁翠娥(1975—),女,本科(学士学位),副主任护士长,主管护士。
The Evaluation of Blind Insertion placed Spiral Nasointestinal Tube for Enteral Nutrition in Patients with Severe (care) Disease
Liang Cuirsquo;e
Abstract: Objective To investigate the efficiency of blind insertion placed spiral nasointestinal tube for enteral nutrition in patients with severe disease, and to put forward corresponding nursing strategy. Methods 120 patients were randomly divided into 2 groups, each with 60 patients. The observation group adopted the spiral nasal tube for enteral nutrition while the control group received traditional nasogastric tube for stomach and intestinal nutrition, and each biochemical indicators between the two groups, and incidence of complications were record and compared. Results After treatment, WBC and APACHE-Ⅱ of two groups decreased obviously, compared with that before treatment, the difference was statistically significant (Plt;0.05), and WBC, APACHE-Ⅱ decrease degree of the observation group were higher than the control group (Plt;0.05); compared with those before treatment, the differences of ALB, ALT, ALP and AST of both the two groups were not statistically significant (Pgt;0.05); gastric retention, gastrointestinal bleeding, reflux, aspiration and nasal mucosa injury rate of the observation group were lower than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (Plt;0.05), compared to those of the control group, the differen
文档评论(0)