我国税务复议前置制度存废分析-analysis on the preservation or abolition of the pre-system of tax reconsideration in china.docxVIP

我国税务复议前置制度存废分析-analysis on the preservation or abolition of the pre-system of tax reconsideration in china.docx

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
我国税务复议前置制度存废分析-analysis on the preservation or abolition of the pre-system of tax reconsideration in china

我国税务复议前置 制度主要体现在《税收征管法》第八十八 条的规定中。虽然只是行政复议的一个部 分,但它发挥着不可替代的重要作用。税务复 议前置制 度的设置可以确保国家税 收利益,维护征税机关公信力,减轻诉讼负担 ,避免司 法资源浪费。但是作为一 种税务争议救济制度,它的缺陷也是明显的。 针对税务 复议前置制度,目前国内 主要有两种观点:一种是保留税务复议前置, 另一种则 是废除税务复议前置,或 者是有条件的予以保留。但是探讨税务复议前 置制度存 废问题的专门文献并不多 ,多是在分析税务行政复议制度问题时提及, 或者是基 于保留复议前置基础上对 税务复议前置制度的完善建议。对比分析国内 外适用税 务复议前置制度的情况, 我国税务复议前置制度存在着诸如违背行政复 议立法初 衷、违背宪法赋予纳税人 的基本权利、违背公平争议原则等缺点,使税 务行政复 议流于形式,应当全部予 以废除。同时,在废除税务复议前置制度后, 我们也应 当进一步完善税务行政复议及诉讼制度,保障纳税人权利救济渠道的畅通。关键词:税务行政复议;税务复议前置;税务复议前置存废;税务行政诉讼AbstractThe pretage of reconsiderision to tax administration is contained in the 88th rule of 《 Taxation Management 》 .Although being a portion of administrative reconsideration, it plays an irreplaceable role. This System of reconsierision canprotect the national taxation, maintain the influence of public credit, ease the burden of lawsuits, avoid the wasting the resource of jurisdiction. Howerver, taken as a relief to taxation dispute its flaw is obvious. There exists mainly two points of view about the pretage of reconsiderision to tax administration.One supports to keep the pretage of reconsiderision System, the other suggests abolishing it or conditionally keep it. However, researches focus on whether the pretage of reconsiderision to tax administration be kept or abolished are not enough. It is just mentioned by analysis that about reconsiderision to tax administration, or only a complement for the pretage of reconsiderision to tax administration.In contrast with the pretage of reconsiderision to tax administration abroad, the pretage of reconsiderision to tax administration in China has some flaws such as going against the original purpose of establishment of the pretage of reconsiderision to tax administration, violating the rights of tax payer, break the principle of fair dispute, etc. The the pretage of reconsiderision to tax administration makes reconsiderision to tax administration become a mere formality, and it should be abolished completely. Besides, when the pretage of

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

xyz118 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档