PHILOSOPHY OF LANGUAGE语言哲学.pptVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
PHILOSOPHY OF LANGUAGE语言哲学

PHILOSOPHY OF LANGUAGE HOW TO TALK ABOUT TALK LOGICAL SEMANTICS Remember: In logical grammar there are 5 kinds of expressions: Predicates: woman, sweet, walks Names: Fred, ∞, Colorado Definite descriptions: the square root of 4, the King of France, the man drinking a martini Logical operators: and, or, not, if, then, any, each, some, most, at least one. The first four are called “sentential connectives,” the remaining ones are called “quantifiers.” Sentences LOGICAL SEMANTICS Predicates stand for classes of things. So, apple stands for the class of apples. Note Well: When I asked the class what apple stood for some people said “a fruit.” But I wasn’t asking for an explanation of what apples are. I wasn’t asking for a dictionary definition. I was asking what things you would point to when teaching a child to use the word apple. That would be apples, of course. Comprende? Names stand for or refer to the single things they are names of. LOGICAL SEMANTICS Definite descriptions also refer or stand for single objects. The F stands for the unique thing that is F, if there is one. If there isn’t one, the definite description is improper. Examples Questions: Is the Rocky Mountains a name or a definite description? Is my father a definite description? Sentences stand for truth values. So all true sentences stand for the same thing, namely, the truth. Likewise for all false sentences. So here again we see the difference between meaning and reference. Not all true sentences have the same meaning! Otherwise there would be only one true statement to make! Sense and Reference We have seen that there are pairs of expressions that (a) have the same reference (nominatum), but (b) do not have the same sense or meaning. More examples It was Frege who first called attention to this rather obvious fact. But if it’s so obvious, what’s the big deal? The big deal is that such examples confirm that meaning (sense) and reference are not the same thing. In general, the mea

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

wuyoujun92 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档