北美精简.docVIP

Do we learn more from people whose ideas we share in common than from those whose ideas contradict ours? The speaker claims so, for the reason that disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning. I concede that undue discord can impede learning. Otherwise, in my view we learn far more from discourse and debate with those whose ideas we oppose than from people whose ideas are in accord with our own. Impede/interfere/intervene/eschew/avoid/thwart/shun/hinder Admittedly, under some circumstances disagreement with others can be counterproductive to Ving learning. For supporting examples one need look no further than a television set. Aside from the foregoing two provisos, however, I fundamentally disagree with the speakers claim. Assuming common ground between two rational and reasonable opponents willing to debate on intellectual merits, both opponents stand to gain much from that debate. Indeed it is primarily through such debate that human knowledge advances, whether at the personal, community, or global level. Conversely/nevertheless/notwithstanding (adv.)/however/nonetheless/to the contraty Accordingly, consequently/wherefore/thereupon/hence/ Finally, at the global level, two nations with opposing political or economic interests can reach mutually beneficial agreements by striving to understand the others legitimate concerns for its national security, its political sovereignty, the stability of its economy and currency, and so forth. Accordingly, on balance the speaker is fundamentally correct. I strongly agree with the assertion that The world around us presents a seamless web of physical and anthropogenic forces, which interact in ways that can be understood only in the context of a variety of disciplines. Two examples that aptly illustrate this point involve the fields of cultural anthropology and astronomy. the life expectancy general well-being solar system the acumen and savvy of business leaders, managers, and politicians In sum, no area of intellec