- 1、本文档共42页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
帮助毁灭 伪造证据行为分析-analysis of helping destroy forged evidence
AbstractThe crime of assisting in destroying and fabricating evidences was a new crime added in 1997 Criminal Law amendment, which is a kind of crime of evidence. The behavior of assisting in destroying and fabricating evidences violates the objective and fairness of the national judicial activities. It appeared frequently in reality but seldom punished in judicial practice. The reason lies in the ambiguity of the conditions of this crime both in theory and judicial practice.Assisting is an act of implementation, the actors should have the subjective intent to recognize damage of their behavior and hope or indulge the acts to play part in judicial activities. As for whether the behavior has the motivation to assist the parties to avoid or reduce the legal sanctions is not a part of the contents of subjective intention. The object of act is not parties but evidence, and the act means includes destruction and fabrication which comprise the hiding, concealing and altering behavior.In accordance with the provisions of existing laws, illegal or criminal act is not the prerequisite to determine the crime of assisting in destroying and fabricating evidences ,that is the assisting behavior may not only appear in criminal proceedings but also in civil or administrative proceedings. And assisting acts should not be limited to the acts in litigation process; the acts before litigation process are also included. The behavior of assisting in destroying and fabricating evidences violates the objective and fairness of the national judicial activities, however it only will be punished when it is serious plot.The common crime of the behavior of assisting in destroying and fabricating evidences need to be discussed in accordance with different proceedings. In criminal proceedings, the common behavior of actors and the parties to destroy and fabricate evidences is common crime. But, this kind of conduct will not be dealt as accomplice because of it’s not have a criminal penalty.When t
您可能关注的文档
- 埃及政治动荡的根源和未来——基于政治现代化视角的分析-the origin and future of egyptian political turmoil an analysis based on the perspective of political modernization.docx
- 埃德加·斯诺在华新闻活动分析-analysis of edgar snow's news activities in china.docx
- 埃利希法社会学理论分析——以《法律社会学基本原理》为核心-theoretical analysis of ehrlich's sociology of law - centered on.docx
- 埃德蒙·金文化相对主义比较教育理论分析范式分析-an analysis of edmund king's comparative educational theory analysis paradigm of cultural relativism.docx
- 埃及公司法律制度分析-analysis of egyptian corporate legal system.docx
- 埃利希法社会学理论研究——以《法律社会学基本原理》为核心-theoretical research on ehrlich's sociology of law - centered on.docx
- 埃洛石纳米管及高岭土纳米管脱硫性能的分析-analysis of desulfurization performance of halloysite nanotubes and kaolin nanotubes.docx
- 埃塞俄比亚职业教育师资来华教育分析-analysis of ethiopian vocational education teachers' education in china.docx
- 埃塞俄比亚对外贸易政策改革对国内生产总值影响分析-analysis of the impact of ethiopia's foreign trade policy reform on gdp.docx
- 埃洛石用于凝胶因子自组装和增强超分子凝胶的分析-application of halloysite in gel factor self-assembly and analysis of enhanced supramolecular gel.docx
文档评论(0)