ProTaper机用锉行后牙根管再治疗时护理研究.docVIP

ProTaper机用锉行后牙根管再治疗时护理研究 　　[摘要] 目的 分析ProTaper机用锉行后牙根管再治疗期间护理干预的方法与应用价值。方法 方便选取2013年1月―2016年1月期间该院收治的80例ProTaper机用锉行后牙根管再治疗患者作为研究对象，按照数字随机表方法进行分组，对照组、观察组中分别纳入40例患者。对照组患者实施常规护理，观察组患者实施术前、术中、术后全方位护理配合。对比观察两组患者在不同护理方法干预下根管治疗后疼痛情况以及并发症发生率的差异。结果 观察组、对照组患者经ProTaper机用锉行后牙根管再治疗后均成功疏通根管，根管治疗完成后相关症状均明显缓解或完全消失。观察组患者行ProTaper机用锉行后牙根管再治疗期间并发症总发生率为5.00%（2/40），显著低于对照组27.50%（11/40）（P0.05）。观察组患者行ProTaper机用锉行后牙根管再治疗期间急性反应发生率为5.00%（2/40），显著低于对照组25.00%（10/40）（P0.05）。结论 在ProTaper机用锉行后牙根管再治疗期间，加强术前、术中、术后全方位护理配合，能够确保患者根管疏通效果，对降低各类并发症发生率以及急性反应发生率均有确切意义。 　　[关键词] ProTaper；根管治疗；护理；并发症 　　[中图分类号] R781 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742（2016）09（b）-0144-04 　　[Abstract] Objective Analysis and Application Value ProTaper rotary file row during root canal after retreatment nursing interventions. Methods Convenient selection in the period from January 2013 to January 2016 in our hospital 80 cases of ProTaper rotary file line after root canal re-treatment of patients as research subjects， according to the random numbers table method group and control group， the observation group were It included 40 patients. Routine care for patients in the control group， the observation group for patients with preoperative， intraoperative and postoperative care-round cooperation.Comparative intervention were observed as well as differences in the incidence of complications after root canal treatment of pain in different methods of care. Results The observation group and control group patients with ProTaper rotary file line after root canal therapy were successfully re-dredge canals， root canal treatment after completion of related symptoms were significantly relieved or completely disappeared. The total complication rate was 5.00% （2/40）， significantly lower than the 27.50% in the control group during the observation group underwent ProTaper rotary file line after root canal retreatment （11/40） （P 0.05）. Observation group underwent ProTaper rotary file row during root canal after retreatment acute reaction rate was 5.00%