- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
                        查看更多
                        
                    
                不同术式对重型颅脑损伤患者血小板活化指标及脑血管痉挛状态影响观察
                    不同术式对重型颅脑损伤患者血小板活化指标及脑血管痉挛状态的影响观察
    [摘要] 目的 观察标准大骨瓣开颅术与小骨窗开颅术对重型颅脑损伤患者血小板活化指标、脑血管痉挛状态的影响。方法 选取2012年5月~2013年6月收治的重型颅脑损伤患者89例,根据所用的不同术式分为小骨窗组(小骨窗开颅术44例)与大骨瓣组(标准大骨瓣开颅术45例),观察不同术式对血小板活化指标、脑血管痉挛状态的影响。结果 两组术后均不同程度提高血小板活化指标水平(CD62p、CD63、GPⅡb/Ⅲa、PAgT),但大骨瓣组治疗后血小板活化指标水平明显低于小骨窗组(P0.05或P0.01);大骨瓣组脑血管痉挛发生率6.67%(3/45)明显低于小骨窗组22.73%(10/44)(P0.05)。结论 对重型颅脑损伤患者应用标准大骨瓣开颅术治疗,能有效降低血小板活化指标,改善脑血管痉挛,相比小骨窗开颅术具有更为理想的临床效果,值得临床对手术方式和手术效果继续探讨。 
  [关键词] 重型颅脑损伤;小骨窗开颅术;标准大骨瓣开颅术;脑血管痉挛;血小板活化 
  [中图分类号] R651.15 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2014)23-0010-03 
  [Abstract] Objective To observe the influences of standard large trauma craniotomy and small bone window craniotomy on the platelet activation indicators and cerebral angiospasm status of the patients with severe craniocerebral injury. Methods Eighty-nine patients with severe craniocerebral injury treated in our hospital from May 2012 to June 2013 were selected and divided into the small bone window craniotomy group(included 44 patients receiving small bone window craniotomy) and the large trauma craniotomy group(included 45 patients receiving standard large trauma craniotomy). The influences of different surgical methods on the platelet activation indicators and cerebral angiospasm status of the patients with severe craniocerebral injury were observed. Results The levels of postoperative platelet activation indicators of both groups increased to varying degrees (CD62p, CD63, GPⅡb/Ⅲa, PAgT), but the postoperative platelet activation indicator level of the large trauma craniotomy group was significantly lower than that of the small bone window craniotomy group (P0.05 or P0.01). The incidence of cerebral angiospasm of the large trauma craniotomy group was 6.67% (3/45), which was significantly lower than the 22.73% (10/44) of the small bone window craniotomy group(P0.05). Conclusion The application of standard large trauma craniotomy in the patients with severe craniocerebral injury can effectively reduce the platelet activation indicators and imp
                 原创力文档
原创力文档 
                        

文档评论(0)