- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
中医针灸治疗136例头痛患者临床疗效观察
中医针灸治疗136例头痛患者的临床疗效观察
摘要:目的:为了探讨临床有效治疗头痛患者的可靠方法。方法:本次研究中所选取的研究对象均为2010年12月至2012年12月期间我院临床收治的头痛患者。全部患者共计136例。采用随机数字表法对患者进行随机分组,分成了中医治疗组(中医针灸治疗)和西医治疗组(西医治疗)。每组68例。本次研究以VAS、PPI、PRI等评分结果以及治疗后的临床整体治疗效果、随访1年内复发情况为观察指标。结果:(1)比较两组患者实施治疗后的VAS、PPI和PRI等三项评分结果,中医治疗组患者的评分结果均明显低于西医治疗组(P均0.05);(2)临床治疗总有效率组间比较,中医治疗组患者的临床总有效率显著高于西医治疗组,且组间数据比较差异经统计学验证,具有显著的统计学意义(P=0.0086);(3)两组患者一年内头痛复发率水平组间比较,中医治疗组的治标水平显著低于西医治疗组(P=0.0153)。结论:在临床针对头痛患者实施治疗的实践过程中,采用中医针灸治疗方法的临床效果显著,是临床针对头痛患者实施治疗的理想选择方式之一。
关键词:中医针灸;头痛;临床疗效;
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the clinical effective and reliable method for the treatment of headache patients. Methods: The headache patients in our hospital from December 2010 to December 2012 were chosen as the research object. All patients were with a total of 136 cases. They were divided into the treatment group of Chinese medicine (acupuncture treatment) and Western medicine treatment group (western medicine) according to the random number table, and 68 cases in each group. The VAS, PPI, PRI and other score results and overall treatment effect in clinical treatment and follow-up recurrence after 1 year were chosen as the research object. Results: (1) The VAS, PPI and PRI three scores for the two groups were compared, the treatment effects of the traditional Chinese medicine group were significantly lower than Western medicine treatment group, the differences between groups were with statistical validated data, and there were significant statistical significance (P 0.05). (2) The total clinical efficiency rates compared between groups, the total effective rate in the traditional Chinese medicine group was significantly higher than that of Western medicine treatment group, and the differences between the two groups of data were with statistical verification, and there were with significant statistical significance (P = 0.0086). (3) The recurrence rates compared between the two groups, the level of the Chinese medicine treatment group was significantly lower than W
原创力文档


文档评论(0)