- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
临床护理路径在重型脑卒中急救中应用效果
临床护理路径在重型脑卒中急救中的应用效果
[摘要] 目的 探?临床护理路径在重型脑卒中急救中的应用效果。 方法 选择2016年1月~2017年6月在我院急诊科急救的重型脑卒中患者120例为研究对象,随机分为干预组与对照组各60例。对照组给予常规急诊护理,干预组采用临床护理路径。比较两组自接诊至确诊时间、抢救时间、抢救费用、平均住院时间、平均住院费用、住院期间并发症、入院时及住院7 d两组患者GCS评分。 结果 干预组接诊至确诊时间、抢救时间显著短于对照组,护理抢救费用显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。干预组肺部感染、尿路感染的发生率显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 重型脑卒中急救中使用临床护理路径能够缩短接诊至确诊时间、抢救时间、住院时间,降低抢救费,减少住院并发症。
[关键词] 重型脑卒中;急救;临床护理路径;应激性溃疡
[中图分类号] R473.74 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2018)10-0151-04
Application effect of clinical nursing pathway in the emergency rescue for severe stroke
WANG Yanqiu1 HONG Qing2
1.Department of Emergency, the First People’s Hospital of Wenling City in Zhejiang Province, Wenling 317500, China; 2.Department of Neurology, the First People’s Hospital of Wenling City in Zhejiang Province, Wenling 317500, China
[Abstract] Objective To explore the application effect of clinical nursing pathway in the emergency rescue for severe stroke. Methods From January 2016 to June 2017, 120 patients with severe stroke in the emergency department of our hospital were selected as the study subjects. The patients were randomly divided into intervention group and control group, with 60 cases in each group. The control group was given routine emergency care, and the control group was given clinical nursing pathway. The time from consultation to diagnosis, rescue time, rescue costs, average length of stay, average hospitalization costs, complications during hospitalization, GCS scores upon admission and 7 days after admission were compared between the two groups. Results The time from consultation to diagnosis and rescue time in the intervention group were significantly shorter than those in the control group, and the rescue cost was significantly lower than that in the control group, the differences were statistically significant(P0.05). The incidence rates of pulmonary infections and urinary tract infections in the intervention group were significantly lower than those in the control group, and
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 企业工会助推企业高质量发展.docx VIP
- 细说通电直导线附近的场摘要:一无限长通电直导线,周围没有电场.DOC
- 昆山联江发纸业有限公司扩建项目.pdf
- 基于bp神经网络的引线键合模型 wire bonding model based on bp neural network.pdf VIP
- 透过“人车家”战略,看小米加码大家电对白电行业影响几何.pdf VIP
- 华师大版科学九年级上册 1-4章化学模块练习(含答案).doc VIP
- 绘本《小鹿历险记》.ppt VIP
- 八年级地理中国海洋资源.ppt VIP
- 纪念与象征——空间中的实体艺术.pptx VIP
- rca医疗案例分析ppt.pptx VIP
文档评论(0)