- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
临床路径在NICU护理中应用价值
临床路径在NICU护理中应用的价值
[摘要] 目的 探究临床路径在NICU(新生儿重症监护病房)护理中应用的价值。 方法 选取该院在2010年11月―2013年11月收治的100例重症监护新生儿,将其随机分为50例对照组和50例观察组。其中,在新生儿重症监护病房中,给予对照组患儿常规护理干预,给予观察组患儿临床路径护理干预。最后观察两组患儿的状况、护理风险事件发生率、护理满意度等。结果 在50例对照组患儿中,救治成功40例,成功率为80%;护理风险事件4例,护理风险发生率8%。在50例观察组患儿中,救治成功48例,成功率为96%;护理风险事件1例,护理风险发生率2%,两组差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。同时,在对照组NICU护理中,护理人员的护理质量、护理满意度评分均明显低于观察组(P0.05),差异有统计学意义。结论 在NICU护理中运用临床路径管理,可有效提高护理质量,提高患儿家属满意度,为母婴提供安全保障,值得在新生儿护理中应用。
[关键词] 新生儿;NICU护理;临床路径;效果
[中图分类号] R47 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2015)02(b)-0149-03
The Application Value of Clinical Pathway to NICU Care
FANG Dongyang
Neonatal ICU, Nanyang Central Hospital, Nanyang, Henan Province, 473003, China
[Abstract] Objective To explore the application value of clinical pathway to neonatal intensive care unit(NICU). Methods 100 neonates with intensive care admitted in our department from November 2010 to November 2013 were selected and randomly divided into the control group and the observation group with 50 neonates in each. In the NICU, the neonates in the control group were given the conventional nursing intervention, and those in the observation group were given the clinical pathway nursing intervention. And the conditions, incidence of nursing risk events and nursing satisfaction rate of the two groups were observed. Results In the control group, 40 cases among the 50 cases were treated successfully, the success rate was 80%; 4 nursing risk events occurred, the incidence of nursing risk was 8%. In the observation group, of the 50 cases, 48 cases were treated successfully, the success rate was 96%; 1 nursing risk event occurred, the incidence of nursing risk was 2%, the differences between the groups were significant(P0.05). The quality of NICU nursing and nursing satisfaction scores of the nursing staff in the control group were much lower than those of the observation group, the differences between the groups were statistically significant(P0.05). Conclusion The application of clinical pathway ma
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 高中英语_Being funny without saying a word教学课件设计.ppt
- 2024版育婴师培训全套课件完整版.docx VIP
- 子网掩码相关教学 子网掩码快速算法.doc VIP
- 什么什么踏地四字成语.docx VIP
- 力士乐卷扬减速机制动器安装拆解图文.pdf VIP
- 新能源汽车充电系统检修:车载充电机的认知与检修PPT教学课件.pptx
- 2025年度食品安全风险日管控、周排查、月调度记录表.pdf VIP
- (新版)消防设施操作员(初级)消防设施操作-考试题库(含答案).docx VIP
- 掘锚一体机检修工操作规程.docx VIP
- 2025年公安局辅警招聘考试试题库(含答案).docx
文档评论(0)