人性化护理干预对慢性心力衰竭患者负性心理及心功能影响.docVIP

人性化护理干预对慢性心力衰竭患者负性心理及心功能的影响 　　[摘要] 目的 探?人性化护理干预对慢性心力衰竭患者负性心理及心功能的影响。 方法 选择我院于2015年6月～2016年6月收治的慢性心力衰竭60例，按照随机数字表法分为干预组与对照组，每组30例。对照组患者给予常规对症护理，干预组在对照组基础上采取人性化护理干预，对两组患者的焦虑、抑郁的负性心理进行评价，并比较两组患者干预前后的LVEF水平，以对患者的心功能改善情况进行评价。 结果 两组患者干预前的SAS、SDS评分比较无统计学差异（P0.05）；干预后，两组患者的SAS、SDS评分分别较干预前显著降低，均有统计学差异（P0.05）；两组干预后LVEF显著增加，与干预前比较均有统计学差异（P0.05）；干预组的LVEF水平显著高于对照组，组间比较有统计学差异（P0.05）。 结论 对慢性心力衰竭患者在积极治疗的同时实施人性化护理干预措施，有利于缓解患者的焦虑、抑郁等负性心理，改善心功能，从而改善患者的预后。 　　[关键词] 慢性心力衰竭；人性化护理；负性心理；心功能 　　[中图分类号] R47 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701（2017）13-0154-03 　　[Abstract] Objective To investigate the effect of humanistic nursing intervention on the negative psychology and cardiac function of patients with chronic heart failure. Methods 60 cases of chronic heart failure in our hospital from June 2015 to June 2016 were randomly divided into intervention group and control group， each group of 30 cases. The control group was given routine nursing， the intervention group was given the humanized nursing intervention on the basis of the control group， the negative psychology of the two groups of patients with anxiety and depression were evaluated and compared before and after the intervention， the LVEF levels of cardiac function in patients chronic heart failure were evaluated. Results There were no significant differences in SAS and SDS scores between the two groups before intervention（P0.05）； After intervention， the SAS and SDS scores in two groups of patients were significantly lower than those before intervention， with statistically significant difference（P0.05）； after intervention， the LVEF levels of two groups increased significantly than before intervention， with statistically significant difference（P0.05）； the level of LVEF in the intervention group was significantly higher than the control group， there were significant differences（P0.05）. Conclusion In active treatment at the same time，patients with chronic heart failure in implementing the humanized nursing intervention can alleviate the patient