- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
保持肢体功能位约束装置研制与应用
保持肢体功能位约束装置的研制与应用
[摘要]目的 分析在ICU重症患者中使用保持肢体功能位约束装置进行辅助治疗的效果。方法 选取2015年7~12月在我院收治的90例ICU重症患者作为研究对象,并将其随机分成对照组与观察组,每组45例;对照组采用常规约束带进行辅助和护理,观察组采用保持肢体功能位约束装置进行辅助和护理,对比两组患者护理过程中的突发事故发生率、肢体周径以及肢体水肿评分、护理满意度。结果 观察组患者在治疗与接受护理过程中突发事故发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组患者的肢体周径明显短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组患者的肢体水肿评分明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组患者对护理服务的满意明显高于对照组(P0.05),差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 对ICU重症患者采用保持肢体功能位约束装置进行辅助,有助于避免突发事故的发生,同时对于降低肢体水肿风险、提高患者满意度具有积极意义,应用价值较高,值得临床推广。
[关键词]肢体功能;约束装置;应用
[中图分类号] R471 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2017)11(a)-0173-03
Development and application of the device for maintaining limb function
LI Qing-lan CHEN Li-hua LI Yun-hong YANG Liu LIU Xiao-lan
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Ganzhou People′s Hospital of Jiangxi Province,Ganzhou 341000, China
[Abstract]Objective To analyze the effect of adjuvant therapy in ICU patients with severe limb function.Methods 90 cases of ICU patients admitted to our hospital from July to December 2015,the patients were randomly divided into control group and observation group, 45 cases in each group,The control group was treated with conventional restraint band and nursing, The observation group was used to maintain the limb function of the device to assist and care, compared the two groups of patients in the care process of the accident rate, limb circumference and limb edema scores and nursing satisfaction.Results The incidence rate of sudden accident in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P0.05).The limb size of the patients in the observation group was significantly shorter than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). The score of body edema was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P0.05).The satisfaction of the patients in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control gro
原创力文档


文档评论(0)