- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
医养一体化护理对老年卒中后遗症期患者康复及负性情绪影响效果
医养一体化护理对老年卒中后遗症期患者康复及负性情绪影响效果
【摘要】 目的:探究医养一体化护理对老年卒中后遗症期患者康复及负性情绪的干预效果。方法:选取2014年7月-2016年7月本院收治的老年脑卒中后遗症期患者88例。按照随机数字表法将其分为试验组和常规组,各44例。常规组应用常?护理干预,试验组应用医养一体化护理干预,两组均随访1年,比较两组护理前后的日常生活活动能力(ADL量表)、运动功能(Fugl-Meyer量表)、焦虑程度(SAS评分)、抑郁程度(SDS评分),比较两组护理满意度及复发率。结果:护理后,试验组ADL评分、上下肢Fugl-Meyer评分均高于常规组,SAS、SDS评分均低于常规组,比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05);试验组复发率为2.27%,低于常规组的13.64%,比较差异有统计学意义( 字2=3.880 1,P=0.048 9);试验组总满意度为95.45%,高于常规组的79.55%,比较差异有统计学意义( 字2=5.090 9,P=0.024 1)。结论:老年卒中后遗症期患者采取医养一体化护理的干预效果十分明显,值得大力推广。
【关键词】 医养一体化护理; 卒中; 后遗症; 康复
【Abstract】 Objective:To explore the effect of integrated medical and nursing care on rehabilitation and negative emotions in elderly patients with stroke sequela.Method:A total of 88 elderly patients with stroke sequela in our hospital from July 2014 to July 2016 were selected.According to the method of random number table,they were divided into experimental group and routine group,44 cases in each group.Routine group was treated with routine nursing intervention,and experimental group was treated with integrated medical and nursing care,they were followed up for 1 year.The activities of daily living(ADL scale),motor function(Fugl-Meyer scale),anxiety degree(SAS score) and depression degree(SDS score) between two groups before and after nursing were compared,and the nursing satisfaction and recurrence rate of two groups were compared.Result:After nursing,ADL scores and Fugl-Meyer scores of upper and lower limbs in experimental group were all higher than those of routine group,and SAS score and SDS score were all lower than those of routine group,the differences were statistically significant(P0.05).The recurrence rate in experimental group was 2.27%,which was lower than 13.64% in routine group,the difference was statistically significant( 字2=3.880 1,P=0.048 9).The total satisfaction rate in experimental group was 95.45%,which was higher than 79.55% in routine group,the difference was statistically significant( 字2=5.090 9,P=0.024 1).Conclusion:The inte
文档评论(0)