- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
利多卡因气雾麻醉在胃镜检查中临床应用
利多卡因气雾麻醉在胃镜检查中临床应用
【摘要】 目的:研究?c探讨利多卡因气雾在胃镜检查中的临床应用效果,并评估其安全性及患者满意度。方法:选取2016年7-9月本院收治的行普通胃镜检查的168例患者为研究对象,按随机数字表法将患者分为观察组和对照组,每组84例。观察组患者检查前行利多卡因气雾麻醉,对照组胃镜检查前口服胃镜胶常规局麻,比较胃镜检查时两组患者的一般生命体征、一次进镜成功率、检查时间、不良反应发生情况及满意度。结果:两组检查前后HR、SBP差值比较,差异均有统计学意义(P=0.02、0.03)。观察组一次进镜成功率为85.7%,明显高于对照组的60.7%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.02)。两组平均检查时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组不良反应发生率为13.1%,低于对照组的29.8%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.002)。观察组患者的满意度为70.2%,高于对照组患者的33.3%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:胃镜检查前予以患者利多卡因气雾局麻临床效果佳,可有效提高胃镜检查成功率,减少术中不良反应,是一种更为有效安全及舒适的胃镜术前检查用药,患者满意度更高,值得临床推广应用。
【关键词】 利多卡因; 胃镜胶; 胃镜
Clinical Application of Lidocaine Aerosol in Gastroscopy/WANG Zhuo-ya,WU Yang-peng.//Medical Innovation of China,2017,14(03):024-027
【Abstract】 Objective:To explore the effect of Lidocaine Aerosol in gastroscopy,and assess its safety and patients’ satisfaction.Method:168 patients who underwent general gastroscopy in our hospital from July 2016 to September 2016 were selected as the research objects,according to random number table,they were randomly divided into observation group and control group,84 cases in each group.The control group was given local anesthesia by oral Endoscopic Glue before examination,the experimental group was anesthetized with Lidocaine Aerosol.The general vital sign,one-time gastroscopy implantation success rate,examination time,adverse drug reactions and patient satisfaction during gastroscopy of the two groups were compared.Result:Before and after examination,the HR difference ans SBP difference of the two groups,the differences were statistically significant(P=0.02,0.03).The one-time gastroscopy implantation success rate of the observation group was 85.7%,which was significantly higher than 60.7% of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P=0.02).There was no significant difference in average examination time between the two groups(P0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 13.1%,which was lower than 29.8% in control group,the difference was statisticall
原创力文档


文档评论(0)