同伴支持干预对社区空巢老年糖尿病患者生活质量影响.docVIP

同伴支持干预对社区空巢老年糖尿病患者生活质量影响.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
同伴支持干预对社区空巢老年糖尿病患者生活质量影响

同伴支持干预对社区空巢老年糖尿病患者生活质量影响   [摘要]目的 探讨同伴支持干预对社区空巢老年糖尿病患者生活质量的影响。方法 选取2015年1~7月深圳市某相邻3个社区共100名确诊治疗的空巢老年糖尿病患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法将其分为观察组和对照组,各50名,对照组给予常规糖尿病健康教育及指导,观察组在其基础上给予为期6个月的同伴支持干预措施,比较两组患者自我管理能力、生活质量、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平及BMI指数。结果 干预前,两组患者自我管理能力5个维度得分结果比较,差异均无统计学意义(P0.05);干预后观察组患者的各维度得分均有所提高,与干预前比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组各维度得分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);干预后观察组患者各指标水平有所降低,与干预前比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组各指标水平均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 社区空巢老年糖尿病患者采用同伴支持模式干预,能够提高患者自我管理能力,改善患者生活质量,有效的控制血糖波动,值得大力推广。   [关键词]同伴支持;空巢老人;糖尿病;生活质量   [中图分类号] R473.2 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2017)05(a)-0173-04   [Abstract]Objective To explore the efficacy of peer support intervention on improving the quality of life in community empty-nest elderly patients with diabetes mellitus.Methods 100 empty-nest elderly patients with diabetes from adjacent communities in Shenzhen were selected in this study from January 2015 to July 2015.The patients were divided into the observation group and the control group according to the random number table method,with 50 cases in each group.Patients in the control group were given routine diabetes health education and guidance,while patients in the observation group were given 6-month peer support intervention on the basis of the control group.The self-management activity,quailty of life,the level of HbA1c and BMI of patients were compared between two groups.Results Before intervention,there were no significantly different among the scores of 5 dimensions of self-management activity in two groups(P0.05);after intervention,those in the observation group were increased,and compared with those before intervention,the differences were statistically significant(P0.05).And those in observation group were higher than those in control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P0.05);after intervention,those in the observation group were all declined,and compared with those before intervention,the differences were statistically significant(P0.05).And those in observation group

文档评论(0)

fangsheke66 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档