- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
心理干预及癌痛规范化治疗对癌症患者T细胞表面PD―1Tim―3影响
心理干预及癌痛规范化治疗对癌症患者T细胞表面PD―1Tim―3影响
[摘要] 目的 探究心理干?A及癌痛规范化治疗对癌症患者T细胞表面PD-1、Tim-3的影响。方法 方便选取2015年6月―2016年11月该院接受规范化镇痛治疗的80例癌痛患者,按随机数字表法分为研究组和对照组,每组40例。两组患者均接受规范化癌痛治疗,对照组实施常规护理,研究组接受心理医师的心理干预。采用疼痛强度数字分级法(NRS)评价两组患者治疗前后的疼痛情况;流式细胞仪检验两组患者治疗前后外周血CD4+T细胞和CD8+T细胞表面PD-1和Tim-3表达情况。结果 NRS评分统计显示,研究组与对照组治疗前分别为(4.76±1.10)分和(4.75±0.91)分,治疗后分别为(1.31±0.42)分和(2.03±0.71)分,治疗后研究组患者的NRS评分显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);治疗后研究组患者CD4+T细胞表面PD-1、Tim-3表达水平显著低于对照组,CD8+T细胞表面PD-1水平显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 心理干预联合癌痛规范化治疗能够有效的减轻患者的疼痛程度,同时能够影响T细胞亚群的分布,降低癌痛患者外周血中Tim-3+、PD-1+表达的T细胞数量,提高患者的免疫力,减轻患者的疼痛。
[关键词] 癌症;免疫细胞;PD-1;Tim-3;规范化治疗;心理干预
[中图分类号] R714 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2017)03(b)-0037-04
[Abstract] Objective To study the effect of mental intervention and standardized treatment of cancer pains on the T cell surface PD-1 and Tim-3 of cancer patients. Methods Convenient selection 80 cases of cancer pain patients treated with standardized analgesia in our hospital from June 2015 to November 2016 were selected and randomly divided into two groups with 40 cases in each, both groups received the standardized treatment of cancer pains, the control group adopted the routine nursing, while the research group adopted the mental intervention of psychologists, and the pain degree before and after treatment of the two groups was evaluated by NRS, and the peripheral blood CD4+T cell and expression of CD8+T cell surface PD-1 and Tim-3 before and after treatment of the two groups was tested by the flow cytometer. Results The NRS score in the research group and in the control group before treatment was respectively (4.76±1.10)points and (4.75±0.91)points and (1.31±0.42 )points and (2.03±0.71)points after treatment, and the NRS score in the research group was obviously lower than that in the control group after treatment, and the difference had statistical significance(P0.05), after treatment, the expression level of CD4+T cell surface PD-1 and Tim-3 in the research group was obviously lower than that in the
文档评论(0)