- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
心理护理干预在妇科肿瘤患者中应用
心理护理干预在妇科肿瘤患者中应用
[摘要] 目的 对妇科肿瘤患者护理中心理护理干预模式的应用效果进行分析。 方法 方便选取医院2016年5月―2017年5月收治的妇科肿瘤患者72例,采用随机划分方法分为对照组、观察组各36例,对照组给予一般护理方法,观察组在基础上引入心理护理干预模式,对两组患者护理前后负性心理改善情况、护理后生活质量改善情况以及护理满意率观察比较。结果 护理干预前,两组患者在SDS、SAS评分上比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05),护理干预后,观察组SDS、SAS评分均低于对照组,护理后观察组SAS、SDS评分分别为(42.33±4.52)分、(40.52±4.25)分低于对照组(54.55±4.50)分、(49.81±6.20)分,比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。生活质量评分比较,各项指标包括生理状态、心理状态、自觉症状与社会功能评分等观察组均高于对照组,差异有统?学意义(P0.05)。护理满意情况,观察组,满意率结果97.22%(35/36)高于对照组83.33%(30/36),两组患者对比差异有统计学意义(χ2=3.96,P0.05) 。结论 妇科肿瘤患者护理中,心理护理干预模式应用下,对改善患者负性心理状态以及生活质量可发挥重要作用,且能够助推良好护患关系的构建,应在临床护理实践中将该模式进一步推广应用。
[关键词] 妇科肿瘤;心理护理干预;效果
[中图分类号] R47 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2018)02(c)-0162-03
Application of Psychological Nursing Intervention in Patients with Gynecological Tumors
CUI Hai-yan, ZHANG Feng-jiao
Gynecology Department, Zibo First Hospital, Zibo, Shandong Province, 255200 China
[Abstract] Objective To analyze the application effect of psychological nursing intervention in patients with gynecological tumor. Methods 72 patients with gynecologic tumor hospital from May 2016 to May 2017 were conveniently selected as study subject and were randomly divided into control group and observation group, each of which contains 36 patients. Patients in the control group were given general nursing method while in the observation group, patients were provided with psychological nursing intervention. Comparing the improvement of negative psychological condition, the improvement of daily life after nursing, and nursing satisfaction rate. Results Before nursing intervention, SDS, SAS score of the two groups had no significant difference (P0.05). After nursing intervention, SDS, SAS scores of the observation group were lower than those of the control group. The SAS, SDS scores were (42.33±4.52)points and (40.52±4.25)points in the observation group, which were lower than that of control group, which were (54.55±4.50)points and (49.81±6.20)points There was a significant difference (P [Key words] G
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 重症护理夜班值班课件.pptx VIP
- 医用空压机基础知识培训课件.pptx VIP
- 2026版高考物理专题提升练习-动量守恒在子弹打木块模型和滑块.docx VIP
- SICK西克KTS&KTX Prime色标传感器操作手册.pdf VIP
- 10.1《 劝学》课件(共36张PPT) 2024-2025学年统编版高中语文必修上册.pptx VIP
- 梅州围龙屋一种富有特色的典型客家围村建筑.pptx VIP
- SICK西克KTS&KTX Prime操作手册.pdf VIP
- [2025秋期版]国开电大专科《人力资源管理》一平台形考任务一至四在线形考试题及答案 (2).pdf
- 模型1弹簧模型-动量守恒的九种模型解读.docx VIP
- 二年级数学上册北师版25秋《小学学霸A卷》.pdf VIP
文档评论(0)