- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
快速检测在成人呼吸道病毒及非典型病原体检测中应用效果
快速检测在成人呼吸道病毒及非典型病原体检测中应用效果
[摘要] 目的 探讨快速检测方法在成人呼吸道病毒及非典型病原体检测中的应用。 方法 选择成人呼吸道感染患者500例为研究对象,鼻咽部分泌物中流感病毒A、B抗原采用胶体金免疫层析法检测,肺炎支原体抗体采用快速培养法检测,同时采用间接免疫荧光法检测血清常见呼吸道病原体IgM抗体。 结果 流感病毒A:快速检测阳性率3.6%,血清学检测阳性率9.2%(P0.01);阳性似然比:6.3,阴性似然比:0.9。流感病毒B:快速检测阳性率0.8%,血清学检测阳性率7.0%(P0.01);阳性似然比:43.0;阴性似然比:0.9。支原体:快速检测阳性率20.2%,血清学检测阳性率12.6%(P0.01);阳性似然比:1.7;阴性似然比:0.8。 结论 成人呼吸道病毒及非典型病原体快速检测方法具有快速、简便、结果快速等优点,但是其灵敏度相对较低。在临床工作中可将快速检测方法作为血清学检查的辅助检查,指导临床诊断和治疗。
[关键词] 呼吸道病毒;非典型病原体;胶体金免疫层析法;快速培养法;间接免疫荧光法
[中图分类号] R56;R446.5 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2015)22-0113-03
Application effect of rapid detection in diagnosis of adult respiratory viruses and atypical pathogens
LIU Fengxia
Department of Laboratory, Juye County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Shandong Province, Juye 274900, China
[Abstract] Objective To discuss the effect of rapid detection in diagnosis of adult respiratory viruses and atypical pathogens. Methods A total of 500 cases with adult respiratory infection were selected as research subjects. Colloidal gold immunochromatographic assay was used to detect nasopharyngeal secretions influenza virus A, B antigen. Rapid culture was used to detect Mycoplasma pneumoniae antigen. At the same time, indirect immunofluorescence was used to detect serum IgM of common respiratory pathogens. Results Influenza virus A: the positive rate of rapid detection was 3.6%, serology detection was 9.2%(P0.01); The positive likelihood ratio was 6.3, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.9. Influenza virus B: the positive rate of rapid detection was 0.8%, serology detection was 7.0%(P0.01); the positive likelihood ratio was 43.0, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.9. Mycoplasma: the positive rate of rapid detection was 20.2%, serology detection was 12.6%(P0.01); The positive likelihood ratio was 1.7, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.8. Conclusion Rapid detection in adult respiratory viruses and atypical pathogens is rapid, simple, fast results, but with low sensitivit
文档评论(0)