恒温湿化器联合密闭式吸痰在气管切开患者护理中应用效果观察.docVIP

恒温湿化器联合密闭式吸痰在气管切开患者护理中应用效果观察.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
恒温湿化器联合密闭式吸痰在气管切开患者护理中应用效果观察

恒温湿化器联合密闭式吸痰在气管切开患者护理中应用效果观察   【摘要】 目的:?^察与研究恒温湿化器联合密闭式吸痰在气管切开患者护理中的应用效果。方法:选取2016年2月-2017年6月本院收治的102例气管切开患者为研究对象,将其根据随机分配的原则分为常规吸痰组(对照组)和恒温湿化器联合密闭式吸痰组(观察组),各51例。统计与比较两组患者肺部感染发生率、人工留管时间、住院时间、患者满意度及干预前后的痰液黏度、血氧饱和度及痰菌阳性率。结果:观察组的肺部感染发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组的人工留管时间及住院时间均短于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组患者满意度均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组干预后不同时间的痰液黏度、血氧饱和度及痰菌阳性率均显著优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:恒温湿化器联合密闭式吸痰在气管切开患者护理中的应用效果较好,适用于气管切开的患者。   【关键词】 恒温湿化器; 密闭式吸痰; 气管切开; 应用效果   Observation on the Application Effect of Constant Temperature Humidifier Combined with Closed Suction in the Nursing of Patients with Tracheotomy/ZENG Xueping,LI Jin.//Medical Innovation of China,2017,14(35):100-103   【Abstract】 Objective:To observe and study the application effect of constant temperature humidifier combined with closed suction in the nursing of patients with tracheotomy.Method:102 patients with tracheotomy in our hospital from February 2016 to June 2017 were selected as the study objects,and they were divided into routine suction group(control group)and constant temperature humidifier combined with closed suction group(observation group),51 cases in each group,by the principle of random distribution.Then the pulmonary infection rates,artificial indwelling drain time,hospitalization time,satisfaction degree of patients,sputum viscosity,blood oxygen saturation and positive rate of sputum bacteria before and after the intervention of two groups were analyzed and compared.Result:The pulmonary infection rate of observation group was lower than that of control group,there was significant difference(P0.05);the artificial indwelling drain time and hospitalization time of observation group were shorter than those of control group,there were significant differences(P0.05);the satisfaction degree of patients in observation group was higher than that of control group,there was significant difference(P0.05);the sputum viscosity,blood oxygen saturation and positive rate of sputum bacteria after the intervent

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

189****7685 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档