- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
循证护理在扩张型心肌病患者中应用效果
循证护理在扩张型心肌病患者中应用效果
[摘要] 目的 探讨循证护理在扩张型心肌病(DCM)患者中的应用效果。 方法 选择2016年4月~2017年2月在哈尔滨医科大学附属第四医院就诊的DCM患者84例,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,每组各42例。对照组采用常规护理模式,观察组在对照组基础上采用循证护理模式,比较护理后两组患者心功能改善情况、相关知识掌握程度和护理满意度。采用焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)及简明健康状况调查表(SF-36)对两组护理前后的焦虑抑郁状态及健康状况进行评价。 结果 护理后观察组总有效率(95.24%)高于对照组(78.57%),差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。观察组护理知识掌握程度得分及满意度均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。护理后两组SDS与SAS评分均低于护理前,SF-36评分均高于护理前,观察组上述评分改善更为显著,差异均有?y计学意义(均P 0.05)。 结论 循证护理模式可改善DCM患者的心功能和健康状况,减轻抑郁焦虑状态,值得临床推广应用。
[关键词] 循证护理;扩张型心肌病;心功能;护理
[中图分类号] R47 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2018)01(b)-0136-04
[Abstract] Objective To explore the effects of evidence-based nursing in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Methods From April 2016 to February 2017, 84 patients with DCM treated in the Fourth Hospital of Harbin Medical University were selected and divided into the control group and the observation group by random number table, with 42 cases in each group. The control group was given conventional nursing model and the observation group was given evidence-based nursing model. The improvement of the cardiac function, the degree of knowledge mastery and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups after nursing. The self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), self-rating depression scale (SAS) and the medical outcomes study 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) were applied to assess the anxity, depression and health status in the two groups before and after nursing. Results After nursing, the total effective rate in the observation group (95.24%) was higher than that of control group (78.57%), with statistically significant difference (P 0.05). The scores of knowledge mastery and nursing satisfaction were all higher than those of control group, with statistically significant differences(P 0.05). After nursing, the scores of SDS and SAS in the two groups were all lower than those of before nursing, the score of SF-36 was higher than that of before nursing, and the scores above in the observation grou
文档评论(0)