中国信用评级标准变化分析-analysis of changes in chinas credit rating standards.docxVIP

中国信用评级标准变化分析-analysis of changes in chinas credit rating standards.docx

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
中国信用评级标准变化分析-analysis of changes in chinas credit rating standards

i i Abstract China’s bond market experienced rapid growth since 2006 and the credit bond market exploded recent years. But China’s bond rating market is facing many problems one of which is the changing standards due to fierce competition. In recent years, the number of upgrades in bond issuers has exceeded the number of downgrades, leading us to suspect that rating agencies are now using looser standards in assigning ratings. To verify my hypothesis, we use an ordered probit rating model to find what rating agencies value most in assigning ratings. To specify a model that fits well into China market, we also do marginal effect analysis to validate our assumption regarding the effect of independent variables on the ratings. And then we add year dummies to see if there is a trend of loosening standards. General regression model and separate regression of different rating agencies are run to find the trend and the difference among agencies. The pooled regression shows that there is a trend of changing standards from 2008 to 2011 and separate regression shows Dagong and Cheng Xin are the main agencies that cause this trend. The marginal effect analysis finds out that the major effect lies in the change of the probability that a company can be rated AA+. Besides, even though different agencies have much in common, each of them also has his own emphasis which may be useful information for issuers and investors. The result of economic importance examination is in line with our regression. Key Words: Rating Agencies, Credit Rating Model, Rating Standards, Order Probit Model ii ii 摘 要 中国的债券市场从2006年开始经历了快速成长,而信用债市场也在近两年得 到了爆发式的增长。但是中国的信用评级却存在很多问题,其中的一个问题就是 激烈的竞争带来的评级标准的不稳定。近几年评级被调高的发行人数量远远超过 评级被调低的发行人数量,这使得我们不得不怀疑评级机构正试图通过放松评级 标准吸引更多的顾客。 为了证实我们的假设,我们使用了序数概率模型找出评级机构看重的因素。 为了检验模型的有效性,我们通过边际效应分析来验证我们就模型变量的影响提 出的假设。然后我们通过增加年份虚拟变量来观察评级标准是否有被放松的迹 象。为了找出趋势并看出四个评级机构的不同,我们对总体样本进行回归的同时 还分机构进行了回归。回归结果表明,2008年到2011年,评级机构的确存在放松 评级标准的趋势,并且对各个评级机构的回归表明这个现象主要存在于大公国际 和中诚信。边际效应分析的结果显示受评级标准变化影

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

peili2018 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档