中国组织情境下进谏行为的实证分析-an empirical analysis of adversity behavior in chinas organizational context.docxVIP

I I I I 中文摘要 Hirschman(1970)最早在其离职—进谏—忠诚的理论模型中将进谏行为作为一个科 学概念进行研究，目前从角色外行为视角探讨进谏行为成为学术界研究的热点。综合以 往研究，本研究从角色外行为的视角，将进谏行为界定为：为了改善组织现状和防止不 利因素对组织造成危害，员工向组织提出建设性意见和表达担忧的人际间交流行为。本 研究分为三个研究，研究一探讨了进谏行为在人口统计学变量上的差异。研究二探讨了 进谏行为在核心自我评价与工作绩效关系中的中介作用，研究三探讨了管理开放性在核 心自我评价与进谏行为关系中的调节作用，最终得到以下结论： (1)进谏行为在学历上达到边缘性显著，在职位上存在极其显著的差异，在其它人 口统计学变量上差异不显著；促进型进谏在职位上存在极其显著的差异，在其它人口统 计学变量上差异不显著；抑制型进谏在学历、职位、单位性质上存在不同程度的显著差 异，在其它人口统计学变量上差异不显著。 (2)进谏行为在核心自我评价与工作绩效的关系中起到部分中介作用。 (3)管理开放性在核心自我评价与进谏行为的关系中起到负向调节作用。 文章最后提出了本研究的创新之处，指出了研究不足和研究展望。 关键词：核心自我评价；管理开放性；进谏行为；工作绩效 III III ABSTRACT Voice behavior as a scientific conception was proposed in Hirschman’s exit-voice-loyalty model at the earliest. It is a hot topics from extra-role behavior perspective in academic circles at the moment. Considering previous research, we insist voice behavior is a interpersonal behavior that employees give advices and express worries to the organization in order to improving current situation and avoiding negative factor. There are three researches in our article. We discuss the discrepancies of voice behavior on demographic variables in research one. The mediating effect of voice behavior in the relationship between core self-evaluation and job performance is examined in research two, and whether managerial openness could moderate the relationship between core self-evaluation and voice behavior is examined in research three. The conclusions are as follows: Voice behavior exists discrepancies on education background and position but not on other demographic variables. Promotive voice exists discrepancies on position but not on other demographic variables. Prohibitive voice exists discrepancies on education background、position and the nature of organization but not on other demographic variables. There is part mediating effect of voice behavior in the relationship between core self-evaluation and job performance. Managerial openness could negatively moderate the relationship between self-evaluation and voice behavior In