彩色多普勒血流成像联合弹性成像多参数分析在乳腺肿块鉴别诊断中价值.docVIP

彩色多普勒血流成像联合弹性成像多参数分析在乳腺肿块鉴别诊断中价值.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
彩色多普勒血流成像联合弹性成像多参数分析在乳腺肿块鉴别诊断中价值

彩色多普勒血流成像联合弹性成像多参数分析在乳腺肿块鉴别诊断中价值   摘要:目的 探讨常规多普勒超声(CDFI)联合超声弹性成像(UE)多参数分析在乳腺良?盒灾卓榧?别诊断中的价值。方法 回顾性分析2015年1月~12月85例患者的92个乳腺肿块的CDFI表现及UE多参数分析,以术后病理结果作为金标准,对CDFI、UE及两者联合诊断对乳腺肿块的鉴别价值采用SPSS18.0 统计软件进行分析,率的比较采用χ2检验,P0.05 为差异有统计学意义。结果 CDFI结果与病理结果相符67个病灶,其诊断敏感性、特异性、准确率分别为:70.0%(16/23),73.9%(51/69),71.7%(67/92)。UE多参数综合诊断结果与病理结果相符71个病灶,其诊断敏感性、特异性及准确性分别为73.9%(17/23),78.4%(54/69),77.2%(71/92)。CDFI与UE联合诊断敏感性、特异性、准确率分别为:86.9%(20/23),89.9%(62/69),89.1%(82/92)。以上三种诊断方法对乳腺肿块的诊断准确率比较,联合应用常规超声与弹性成像技术能明显提高诊断敏感性,特异性及准确率(P0.05)。结论 CDFI联合UE多参数分析可提高乳腺肿块诊断准确率。   关键词:乳腺肿块;彩色多普勒血流显像;弹性成像技术;联合诊断   Abstract:Objective To study the value of the combination of color doppler ultrasound and elastography multiparameter in the diagnosis of breast tumor. Methods Clinical characteristics of 92 nodules in 85 patients were examined by color doppler ultrasound and elastography, with postoperative pathology results as gold standard. Comparison was made between the diagnosis of the ultrasound and pathology results by using SPASS 18.0 software to evaluate clinical value of combined application of doppler ultrasound and elastography in the differential diagnosis of breast nodules. The test was used in the ratio comparison, and P0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The diagnostic results of 67 nodules using CDFI were in accordance with the athological results. The sensitivity, specificity,and accuracy of CDFI in detecting breast nodules were 70.0%,73.9%,and 71.7% respectively. 71 nodules using UE were in accordance with the athological results. The sensitivity, specificity,and accuracy of CDFI in detecting breast nodules were 73.9%,78.4%,and 77.2% respectively. Those of combination of CDFI and UE were 86.9%,89.9%,and 89.1% respectively. There wsa significant difference between three diagnostic performances in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast nodules(P0.05). Conclusion The combination of CDFI and UE could improve the diagnostic accuracy of breast nodules.   Key word

文档评论(0)

bokegood + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档