损伤控制理论在老年髋关节骨折患者中应用效果.docVIP

损伤控制理论在老年髋关节骨折患者中应用效果.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
损伤控制理论在老年髋关节骨折患者中应用效果

损伤控制理论在老年髋关节骨折患者中应用效果   [摘要] 目的 探讨损伤控制理论对老年人髋关节骨折患者疾病治愈率及并发症发生率的影响。 方法 选取同济大学附属普陀人民医院2015年1月~2017年5月145例老年髋关节骨折患者,采用抽签法随机分为两组,对照组采用常规的治疗方法,治疗组在对照组常规治疗方法基础上采用损伤控制理论。比较两组患者治疗效果、生活质量评分、焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表评分(SDS)、牛津残障评分(OHS功能量表评分)和并发症发生情况。 结果 治疗组治疗优良率显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05),治疗组护理干预后评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。治疗组的并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。 结论 老年髋关节骨折患者采用损伤控制理论可以加快愈合时间,减少患者疼痛,减少并发症的发生,具有较高的临床价值。   [关键词] 损伤控制理论;髋关节骨折;老年;治愈率;并发症   [中图分类号] R683.42 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2018)04(a)-0083-04   [Abstract] Objective To investigate the effect of damage control theory on the cure rate and complication rate of elderly patients with hip fracture. Methods From January 2015 to May 2017, 145 elderly patients with hip fracture were selected and randomly divided into two groups from Putuo People′s Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University. The control group was received conventional treatment and the treatment group was received the injury control theory on the basis of conventional treatment. The efficacy, quality of life, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS), Oxford disability scale (OHS scale) and complication were compared. Results The excellent and good rate of the treatment group was significantly higher than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). The scores of quality of life of the treatment group were higher than the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P 0.05). SAS and SDS scores of the two groups after treatment were significantly lower than before treatment, and the treatment group scores were lower than the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the OHS scores before treatment, and the scores of the treatment group after treatment were lower than those of the control group (P 0.05). The incidence of complications in the treatment group was lower than that in the control g

文档评论(0)

3471161553 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档