脊髓损伤后神经源性肠道功能障碍患者综合护理干预分析.docVIP

脊髓损伤后神经源性肠道功能障碍患者综合护理干预分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
脊髓损伤后神经源性肠道功能障碍患者综合护理干预分析

脊髓损伤后神经源性肠道功能障碍患者综合护理干预分析   【摘要】 目的:探?脊髓损伤后神经源性肠道功能障碍患者实施综合护理干预的效果。方法:选择2015年4月-2017年10月来院检查并治疗的脊髓损伤后神经源性直肠功能障碍患者71例,按照入院时间先后顺序分为研究组(n=36)和参照组(n=35)。参照组患者应用常规护理,研究组患者应用综合护理干预,对两组患者的生活质量、肠道功能和护理满意度进行对比分析。结果:护理前,两组患者的生活质量评分对比,差异无统计学意义(P0.05);护理后,两组患者的生活质量评分均高于护理前,差异均有统计学意义(t=11.077 0、4.921 5,P=0.000 0、0.000 0),且研究组的生活质量评分显著高于参照组,差异有统计学意义(t=5.751 8,P=0.000 0)。研究组的排便时间明显短于参照组,便秘评分显著高于参照组,差异均有统计学意义(t=7.364 4、33.056 1,P=0.000 0、0.000 0)。研究组患者的总满意率为97.22%,高于参照组的68.57%,差异有统计学意义( 字2=10.372 2,P=0.001 2)。结论:对于脊髓损伤后神经源性肠道功能障碍患者来说,应用综合护理干预效果显著,极大地改善了患者肠道功能和生活质量,具有较高的实践应用价值。   【关键词】 脊髓损伤; 神经源性直肠功能障碍; 综合护理干预   An Integrated Nursing Intervention Analysis of Neurogenic Intestinal Dysfunction after Spinal Cord Injury/CHEN Ling,ZHAN Qiuqing,DENG Meiding,et al.//Medical Innovation of China,2018,15(03):076-079   【Abstract】 Objective:To investigate the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on patients with neurogenic bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury.Method:From April 2015 to October 2017,71 patients with neurogenic rectal dysfunction after spinal cord injury were selected in our hospital,according to the order of admission time,they were divided into the study group (n=36) and the reference group (n=35).The patients in the reference group were given routine nursing,and the patients in the study group were treated with comprehensive nursing intervention,the quality of life,intestinal function and nursing satisfaction of the two groups were compared and analyzed.Result:Before nursing,the quality of life scores of the two groups were compared,the difference was not statistically significant(P0.05);after nursing,the quality of life scores of the two groups were higher than those before nursing,the differences were statistically significant (t=11.077 0,4.921 5;P=0.000 0,0.000 0),   and quality of life score of the study group was significantly higher than that of reference group,the difference was statistically significant(t=5.751 8,P=0.000 0).The defecation time of the

文档评论(0)

189****7685 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档