舒适护理在急性上呼吸道感染患者中应用体会.docVIP

舒适护理在急性上呼吸道感染患者中应用体会 　　[摘要] 目的 探究舒适护理在急性上呼吸道感染患者中的应用效果。方法 方便选取2014年7月―2016年7月该院收治的急性上呼吸道感染的患者120例，按照随机的分配原则分成对照组与观察组，各60例，两组患者均接受常规治疗，同时对照组给予常规护理，观察组应用舒适护理干预。比较两组的护理效果和患者对护理的满意度。 结果 在护理总的有效率方面比较，对照组（70.0%）低于观察组（93.3%），差异有统计学的意义（P0.05）。观察组患者的平均退热时间，咳嗽消失时间和住院时间均较对照组短，差异有统计学的意义（P0.05）。在护理的满意度方面比较，对照组（63.6%）低于观察组（96.7%），差异有统计学的意义（P0.05）。结论 舒适护理应用于急性上呼吸道感染患者中的临床效果显著，可缩短住院时间，减少治疗成本，应在临床中推广应用[1-2]。 　　[关键词] 舒适护理；急性上呼吸道感染；应用体会 　　[中图分类号] R47 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742（2017）04（a）-0166-03 　　Experience of Application of Comfort Nursing in Patients with Acute Upper Respiration Infection 　　DONG Yu-rong 　　Yubei District People’s Hospital， Chongqing， 401120 China 　　[Abstract] Objective To study the application effect of comfort nursing in patients with acute upper respiration infection. Methods 120 cases of patients with acute upper respiration infection from July 2014 to July 2016 were convenient selected and randomly divided into two groups with 60 cases in each， both groups were given the routine treatment， and the control group adopted the routine nursing， while the observation group adopted the comfort nursing intervention， and the nursing effect and nursing satisfactory degree were compared between the two groups. Results The total nursing effective rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group（93.3% vs 70.0%）， and the difference was statistically significant（P0.05）， the average defervescence time， cough disappearance time and length of stay in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group， and the differences were statistically significant（P0.05）， and the nursing satisfactory degree in the control group was lower than that in the observation group（63.6% vs 96.7%）， and the difference was statistically significant（P0.05）. Conclusion The clinical effect of comfort nursing in patients with acute upper respiration infection is obvious， which can shorten the length of stay and reduce the treatment cost， and it is worth clinical