- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
麦默通旋切活检术切除乳腺隐匿性肿块临床应用价值分析
麦默通旋切活检术切除乳腺隐匿性肿块临床应用价值分析
[摘要]目的 探讨麦默通旋切活检术切除乳腺隐匿性肿块(NPBL)的临床应用价值。方法 选取2014年2月~2016年2月我院接诊的经多普勒超声仪诊断、发现有乳腺肿块的196例患者作为研究对象,按照治疗方法的不同分为观察组(99例)和对照组(97例)。观察组采用麦默通旋切活检术,对照组采用传统方法。比较两组的手术时间、恢复时间、切口长度、术中出血量、NRS评分、患者满意度。结果 观察组的手术时长、恢复时间、瘢痕长度显著短于对照组,出血量少于对照组,NRS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组的满意度为88.9%,显著高于对照组的73.2%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组的手术复发率为5.1%,显著低于对照组的15.5%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组的血肿、皮肤瘀斑发生率显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 采用麦默通旋切活检术切除NPBL较传统乳腺肿块切除术的手术损伤小、并发症少,患者满意度高。
[关键词]麦默通旋切活检术;乳腺隐匿性肿块;乳腺癌
[中图分类号] R737.9 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2016)10(b)-0029-03
[Abstract]Objective To explore the clinical application value of Mammotome spiral cutting biopsy in excision of non-palpable breast lesion (NPBL).Methods 196 patients diagnosised with breast masses by Doppler ultrasonography from February 2014 to February 2016 in our hospital were selected and divided into the observation group (100 cases) and the control group (96 cases) according to the different treatment methods.The observation group was given Mammotome spiral cutting biopsy excision,the control group was given the traditional method.The operation time,recovery time,incision length,intraoperative blood loss and the NRS score,patient satisfaction of the two groups were compared.Results The operation time,recovery time and scar length of the observation group was shorter than that of the control group,the amount of bleeding in the observation group was less than that in the control group,and the NRS score in the observation group was lower than that in the control group,with significant difference (P0.05).The degree of satisfaction in the observation group was 88.9%,which was higher than 73.2% in the control group,with significant difference (P0.05).The recurrence rate of the observation group was 5.1%,which was lower than 15.5% of the control group,with significant difference (P0.05).The incidence rate of hematoma,skin ecchymosis in the observation group was lower than that in the control group,with significant differen
文档评论(0)