化学发光法和酶联免疫吸附法进行血HIV检测效果评价.docVIP

化学发光法和酶联免疫吸附法进行血HIV检测效果评价.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
化学发光法和酶联免疫吸附法进行血HIV检测效果评价

化学发光法和酶联免疫吸附法进行血HIV检测效果评价   [摘 要] 目的:比较化学发光法与酶联免疫吸附法在血液HIV检测中的应用效果。方法 :对本院2014年 3月至 2015年 9月期间所有术前检查病人利用化学发光法和酶联免疫吸附法进行HIV筛查试验检测。结果:35420例病人血清标本中,化学发光法和酶联免疫吸附法均判定阳性29例,金标准免疫印迹法(WB)确定25例为阳性,4例为阴性。化学发光法阳性酶联免疫吸附法阴性的10例,WB检测结果阳性8例,阴性2例。化学发光法比酶联免疫吸附法真阳性率高,但是假阳性率也增加。通过对比S/CO不同值,发现化学发光法假阳性率出现在S/CO≤500,并且随着S/CO值降低,假阳性率升高明显;S/CO500,化学发光法准确性明显升高。结论与酶联免疫吸附法相比,在一定范围内,化学发光法更适用血液HIV筛查。   [关键词] 化学发光法;酶联免疫吸附法;人类免疫缺陷病毒   中图分类号:R446 文献标识码:B 文章编号:2095-5200(2016)05-078-03   [Abstract] Objective: To compare the application effects of chemical luminescence method method and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on the detection of HIV in blood. Methods: All patients in our hospital from March 2014 to September 2015 were examined by using chemiluminescence and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for HIV screening test. Results: In 35420 cases of serum samples, 29 cases were both positive through the methods of chemiluminescence and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and the gold standard Western blotting (WB) confirmed that 25 cases were positive and 4 cases were negative. 10 cases were tested for positive through chemical luminescence method method but for negative through enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, and its WB test results were positive in 8 cases, negative in 2 cases. The true positive rate of chemical luminescence method method was higher than that of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, but the false positive rate was also increased. Through the comparison of different S/CO values, we found that the false positive rate of using chemical luminescence method method occurred as S/CO≤500, and with the decrease of S/CO value, false positive rate increased significantly; as S/CO500, the accuracy of chemical luminescence method increased significantly. Conclusions: Compared with the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in a certain range, the chemical luminescence method is more suitable for HIV screening in blood.   [Key words] CLIA; Elisa; HIV   获得性免疫缺乏综合征简称艾滋病(AIDS),是由人类免疫缺陷病毒(human i

文档评论(0)

151****1926 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档