贵州省贫困发生率和生境退化程度相关性分析.docVIP

贵州省贫困发生率和生境退化程度相关性分析.doc

此“经济”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
贵州省贫困发生率和生境退化程度相关性分析

贵州省贫困发生率和生境退化程度相关性分析   摘 要 为探究贫困发生率与生境退化程度之间的空间相关性,以贵州省为例,利用InVEST模型,对全省生境退化程度进行评估,进而利用GeoDa软件分析贵州省贫困发生率与生境退化程度之间相关性.结果表明:(1)2010年贵州省贫困发生率与生境退化程度空间异质性突出,东部、西部和南部贫困发生率大于中部和北部,中西部生境退化程度大于东南部和南部.(2)贫困发生率与生境退化之间存在负相关关系,且以负相关的低高集聚和高低集聚为主.贫困发生率越大的地区生境退化程度越小.贫困发生率与生境退化的双变量LISA聚集图中,以高-低相关和低-高相关为主,其分布集中于东南部和中部.贫困程度与人为地类空间格局的差异是造成贫困发生率与生境退化之间负相关的主要原因.   关键词 贫困发生率;生境退化;空间相关性;贵州省   中图分类号 F323.8 文献标识码 A 文章编号 1000-2537(2017)03-0015-06   Correlation Analysis Between Poverty Incidence and   Habitat Degradation in Guizhou Province   HAN Hui-qing1, LI Song2*, YU Hong-yan2   (1. College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Guizhou Institute of Technology, Guiyang 550003, China;   2. Institute of Resources, Environment and Disasters, Guizhou Normal College, Guiyang 550018, China)   Abstract In order to explore the correlation between poverty incidence and habitat degradation, taking Guizhou province as an example, we evaluated the habitat degradation degree in the entire province using the InVEST model. Then, the spatial correlation between poverty incidence and habitat degradation was analyzed using the GoeDa model. Our results are as follows: (1) There was clear space heterogeneity for poverty incidence and habitat degradation in 2010. Poverty incidences in east, west and south parts were higher than those in north and central parts. Habitat degradation degree in midwest was higher than that in southeast and south parts. (2) There was a negative correlation between poverty incidence and habitat degradation. High-low group and low-high group were the main types. A higher poverty incidence in administrative region had a lower habitat degradation degree. The high-low group and low-high group were located in southeast and central part for bivariate LISA cluster map of poverty incidence with habitat degradation. The different spatial pattern of poverty grade and human land use types are the main reasons resulting in the negative correlation between poverty incidence and habitat d

文档评论(0)

130****9768 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档