超声介入冷循环微波和冷循环射频治疗肝癌临床对比研究.docVIP

超声介入冷循环微波和冷循环射频治疗肝癌临床对比研究 　　【摘要】 目的：探讨肝癌应用超声介入冷循环微波治疗与冷循环射频治疗效果对比情况。方法：选取本院2013年9月-2015年9月收治的肝癌患者100例，采用数字表法随机分为微波组与射频组，每组各50例。微波组给予超声介入冷循环微波治疗，射频组给予冷循环射频治疗，比较两组的临床疗效及并发症。结果：两组患者治疗前后的肝功、临床疗效、并发症比较差异均无统计学意义（P0.05）。结论：针对临床收治的肝癌病例，超声介入冷循环与冷循环射频治疗均为有效手段，两者有基本相同的治疗效果。 　　【关键词】 超声介入冷循环微波； 射频； 肝癌； 效果对比 　　Clinical Comparative Study of Ultrasound Intervention in the Treatment of Liver Cancer with Cold Circulating Microwave and Cold Cycle Radiofrequency/XU Yu-guang.//Medical Innovation of China，2016，13（22）：048-051 　　【Abstract】 Objective：To investigate the effect of the application of ultrasonic interventional therapy in the treatment of liver cancer with cold circulating microwave and cold cycle radiofrequency.Method：100 liver cancer patients were treated in our hospital from September 2013 to September 2015， according the randomly number table method，they were divided into microwave group and RF group，50 cases in each group.The microwave group was given ultrasound intervention in the cold cycle microwave treatment，and RF group was given cold cycle radiofrequency.The clinical curative effect and complications of two groups were compared.Result：The liver function，clinical curative effect，and complications of two groups were compared，the differences were no statistically significant（P0.05）.Conclusion： In the clinical treatment of liver cancer cases，the ultrasound intervention in the cold cycle and cold cycle of radiofrequency treatment are effective means，they have same treatment effect. 　　【Key words】 Ultrasound intervention cold circulating microwave； Radiofrequency； Liver cancer； Effect comparison 　　First-author’s address：Guangdong Zhongshan People’s Hospital，Zhongshan 528403，China 　　doi：10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2016.22.012 　　肝癌为临床恶性肿瘤常见类型，手术为现阶段首选治疗方案，但肝癌患者在病程早期缺乏特异性临床表现，症状、体征相对隐匿，明确诊断时多已进展至中晚期，已不具备常规手术条件[1]。超声引导下瘤内穿刺消融可有效毁灭肿瘤组织，作用显著，目前已在临床广泛推广[2]。微波和射频为两种常用消融技术，但哪项更占优势，临床尚无定论。本次选取相关病例，分别采用超声介入冷循环微波治疗及冷循环射频治疗，对比临床效果，旨在为临床应用提供准确的参考依据，现报道如下。 　　1 资料与方法 　　1.1 一般资料 选取本院