补照海泻申脉为主针刺治疗失眠的临床疗效观察针灸推拿学专业论文.docxVIP

  • 41
  • 0
  • 约3.03万字
  • 约 36页
  • 2018-10-16 发布于上海
  • 举报

补照海泻申脉为主针刺治疗失眠的临床疗效观察针灸推拿学专业论文.docx

补照海泻申脉为主针刺治疗失眠的临床疗效观察针灸推拿学专业论文

补 补照海泻申脉为主针刺治疗失眠的临床疗效观察 陕 陕西中医学院 2013 届硕士学位论文 PAGE PAGE 13 PAGE PAGE 10 The Clinical Effect Observation of Reinforcing Zhaohai and Reducing Shenmai primarily to Insomnia with Needling Abstract Object: To observe and study the effect of reinforcing Zhaohai (twisting and turning 81 times to reinforcement) and reducing Shenmai (twisting and turning 36 times to reducing) primarily to insomnia with needling, and to discuss the effect on insomnia of reinforcing and reducing manipulation and the acupoints match . Method: Divide randomly into 2 treatment groups according to the order of patients treated, 30 patients each group, together 60 cases. Investigate randomly 30 ordinary persons who had no sleep disorders and no treatments, regard as the normal control group. Group 1, needle Zhaohai, Shenmai, Sanyinjiao, Shenmen, and Yintang, and manipulate reinforcing and reducing when Qi sensation was felt, reinforcing Zhaohai before reducing Shenmai; group 2, needle Zhaohai, Shenmai, Sanyinjiao, Shenmen, and Yintang, without reinforcing and reducing when Qi sensation was felt. After the treatment course was over, collect and classify the effect indicator data (sleep efficiency, Pittsburgh sleep quality index scale) and related data. ⅰComparison of the two sample difference before treatment, with Statistical Pared Sample t Test; ⅱComparison of one group’s sleep efficiency and Pittsburgh sleep quality index scale grades before and after treatment, with Statistical Pared Sample t Test; ⅲComparison of sleep efficiency and Pittsburgh sleep quality index scale grades between groups after treatment, with Statistical Pared Sample t Test; ⅳComparison of sleep efficiency and Pittsburgh sleep quality index scale grades between group 1 after treatment and group 3, and between group 2 after treatment and group 3, with One Sample t Test. Results: ⅰAll comparisons were P0.05, the samples of two groups had no statistical differences; ⅱAll comparisons were P0.01, both group 1 and group 2 be

文档评论(0)

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档