头痛宁方治疗偏头痛临床的研究.docVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
头痛宁方治疗偏头痛临床的研究

头痛宁方治疗偏头痛临床的研究   摘要:目的 观察头痛宁方治疗偏头痛的临床疗效。方法 将100例偏头痛风邪上扰、瘀血阻络证患者随机分为试验组和对照组各50例。试验组予头痛宁方口服,对照组予氟桂利嗪胶囊5 mg口服,疗程30 d。观察2组患者治疗前后偏头痛发作次数、程度、持续时间、伴随症状分值及总分,记录药物不良反应,评价临床疗效及安全性。结果 试验组总有效率为92.0%(46/50),对照组为64.0%(32/50);不良反应发生率试验组为20.0%(10/50),对照组为80.0%(40/50)。2组疗效及不良反应比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。2组治疗后偏头痛发作次数、持续时间及伴随症状分值比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。各指标得分治疗前后差值组间比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 头痛宁方能够明显改善风邪上扰、瘀血阻络证偏头痛患者的症状,且不良反应少,较氟桂利嗪更为安全有效。   关键词:头痛宁方;偏头痛;氟桂利嗪;临床研究   DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-5304.2016.04.004   中图分类号:R277.772 文献标识码:A 文章编号:1005-5304(2016)04-0012-04   Clinical Study on Toutongning Formula in Treatment of Migraine REN Shan, CHEN Zhi-gang (Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100078, China)   Abstract: Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of Toutongning Formula in the treatment of migraine. Methods Totally 100 cases of migraine patients (wind disturbance, blood stasis syndrome) were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in the experimental group were treated with Toutongning Formula orally, and patients in the control group were treated with flunarizine capsules 5 mg orally, for 30 d. The scores of number, degree, duration and accompanying symptoms of episodes before and after treatment were observed, the total scores were calculated, and adverse reactions were recorded, to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety. Results Clinical total efficiency was 92.0% (46/50) in experimental group and 64.0% (32/50) in the control group; the incidence rate of adverse reactions was 20.0% (10/50) in experimental group and 80.0% (40/50) in the control group; there was statistical significant differences in efficacy and adverse reactions between the two groups (P0.05). After the treatment, the differences in the scores of number, degree, duration and accompanying symptoms of episodes, and in the total scores between the two groups was statistically significant (P0.05). There was statistical significance in the different value of above indexes before and after

文档评论(0)

erterye + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档