对第三人侵害债权的思考-法律专业论文.docxVIP

I I 对第三人侵害债权的思考 中文摘要 中文摘要 侵害债权是指第三人故意实施或与债务人恶意串通实施的，旨在侵害债权人 的债权并给债权人造成损害是的行为。而第三人是指合同外的第三人，即在债的 关系以外的。 第三人侵害他人债权的行为几乎存在于社会的各个领域、各个环节，侵害债 权行为的性质以及救济方式是民法上长期争论的一个热门话题。我国现行法律对 该问题一直没有明确的规定，而已经开始施行的《侵权责任法》也未针对此侵权 行为进行明确的规定。法学理论界对这一问题也存在着很多说法，莫衷一是。比 较常见的三种意见：第一种持否定态度，认为侵权行为是以绝对权为侵害对象的， 而债权是一种相对权，不能作为侵权行为的对象；第二种持肯定的态度，认为第 三人虽然处在债的关系以外，但仍旧可以构成侵权人；第三种持折衷的态度，认 为第三人的行为理论上可以构成对债权的侵害，但是债权不具有公示性，让第三 人承担侵权责任显得过于苛刻，应谨慎。笔者较为赞同第二种态度，将会在文中 从法律构成方面及其他相关问题对第三人债权侵权行为进行阐述，以及结合合同 债权中的一些问题对我国的相关立法和司法实践方面提出一点意见和建议。 关键词：债权 侵害债权 第三人 侵权行为 作 者：周 晖 指导老师：冯 兵 II II Abstract Infringement Claims Against the Third of Thinking Infringement Claims Against the Third of Thinking Abstract Infringement claims is the third person, or intentionally malicious collusion with the debtor and which are aimed against the claims of creditors and to the damage caused by the behavior of creditors. The third is the third person outside the contract, that the relationship between debt outside. Infringement of third party claims exist in the behavior of almost all areas of society, all aspects of the nature of acts of infringement claims, and civil law remedies are a hot topic of long debate. Chinas current law on this issue has not been clearly defined, but the beginning of the implementation of the Tort Liability Act in this respect is also ignored. Legal theorists on this issue there are many versions. Three views of the more common：The first negative attitude that is absolutely right for the violations against the targets, but debt is a relative right, not as the object of tort；The second hold a positive attitude, that although the third person outside the relationship in debt, but people can still be an infringement; A third compromise approach holds that the behavior of the third theory may constitute an infringement of the claims, but the claims do not have the publicity of, so the third bear tort liability seems too harsh, should be carefully。The author is more sympathetic to the second approach。The paper will c