网站大量收购闲置独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

单向倒刺线在腹腔镜胆总管切开取石一期缝合术中的应用研究-外科学(普通外科)专业论文.docx

单向倒刺线在腹腔镜胆总管切开取石一期缝合术中的应用研究-外科学(普通外科)专业论文.docx

  1. 1、本文档共35页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
单向倒刺线在腹腔镜胆总管切开取石一期缝合术中的应用研究-外科学(普通外科)专业论文

Ab Abstract PAGE PAGE IV ABSTRACT Background and Objective: In recent years, with the development of minimally invasive techniques, Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and primary suture(LBEPS) has become a commonly used method for the treatment of common bile duct stones.But it has been greatly limited by the operation of laparoscopic high technical requirements. unidirectional barbed suture is a new type of knotless absorbable suture,which can avoided kont component in the operation and promote the laparoscopic suturing.The efficacy of barbed sutures have been reported in gynecologic and urologic surgery to date.But there are few reports in general surgery.So through a comparative study of unidirectional barbed suture and ordinary absorbable suture,to evaluate the feasibility, safety and application effect of unidirectional barbed suture in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and primary suture. Methods: From January 2013 to December 2014, all 55 patients undergoing LBEPS were enrolled in the retrospective study,and divided into two groups according to the different suture type which be used intraoperative: A group, the unidirectional barbed suture group (23 cases); B group, ordinary absorbable suture group (32 cases). Compare two groups of intraoperative situation:(operation time, intraoperative blood loss) and postoperative situation( postoperative intestinal function recovery time, the incidence of bile leakage,postoperative hospital stay and related complications).The preoperative general information and postoperative complications were analysized by the Chi-square test.The operative time,blood loss,postoperative hospital stay and intestinal function recovery time were analysized by two-sample t-test analysis.The data was calculated by SPSS 22.0 statistical software, with α = 0.05 level for the test level. Results: General situation: There were no significant difference between the two groups in age distribution, sex ratio, diameter of common bi

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

peili2018 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档